[mapserver-dev] RFC 86: Call for vote

[thomas bonfort]

Steve, Daniel, Jeff,

In
https://github.com/mapserver/docs/commit/db54f7cfa603a545a3a9308ee434527f462d9f0dI
have tried to address the issues you arose.
HTH,
Thomas


On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri at swoodbridge.com
> wrote:

> +1 SteveW  but ...
>
> I think the RFC needs some updating to address Jeff's issue for the doc
> team. Also re-reading the RFC I noticed that it does not specify if the the
> ranges need to be ordered or not and in the email thread you mentioned the
> there has to be a zero item as you check for that. So I think some
> additional detail, to help the doc team. This could be added once the code
> is checked in based on the final implementation.
>
> BTW, I think this is an excellent design given all the discussion we had
> earlier on it and it will a very useful feature for users. Thanks!
>
>
> On 12/12/2012 6:06 AM, thomas bonfort wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>> Please vote on RFC 86, scale dependent token replacements (
>> http://mapserver.org/**development/rfc/ms-rfc-86.html<http://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-86.html>)
>>
>> I'll start with my +1.
>>
>> thanks,
>> thomas
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> mapserver-dev mailing list
>> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev>
>>
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-dev/attachments/20121213/7ecc82e9/attachment.html>