[mapserver-dev] libtool build: call for vote

Umberto Nicoletti umberto.nicoletti at gmail.com
Thu Feb 23 08:59:13 EST 2012


Done, thanks

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:54 PM, thomas bonfort <thomas.bonfort at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Umberto,
> Thanks for dealing with this. Just one remark: I don't think it's a
> good idea to put in the readme that you can copy .libs/libxxx.so to
> the destination folder: that file is private to libtool, and should
> only be manipulated through libtool itself.
>
> cheers,
> thomas
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 14:49, Umberto Nicoletti
> <umberto.nicoletti at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thomas,
> > Just want to let you know I have just commited some changes to fix an
> error
> > that prevented Java mapscript from working.
> >
> > While I was at it I've also
> > tackled http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/2595#comment:5 (blushing,
> > mutters an apology) so now the shared library is called libjavamapscript
> and
> > is fully numbered like its mapserver counterpart.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Umberto
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 7:36 PM, thomas bonfort <
> thomas.bonfort at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I have committed the changes in r12907, along with changes to the
> >> builds of python and php mapscript.
> >>
> >> building steps:
> >>
> >> ./configure [previous opts] --prefix=/usr/local
> >> make
> >> sudo make install
> >> cp /usr/local/bin/mapserv [cgi-bin-directory] #do *not* directly copy
> >> the mapserv binary from our top-level source directory, as it is a
> >> wrapper script and not compiled machine code.
> >>
> >> python and php mapscript are both built with make && make install. The
> >> other mapscript flavors will probably not compile, I will get back to
> >> them in a second step if no one wants to volunteer on the task.
> >>
> >> please report back any issues in this thread or with a trac ticket.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >>
> >> thomas
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 05:04, Perry Nacionales <pnaciona at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > -Perry
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:37 AM, thomas bonfort
> >> > <thomas.bonfort at gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I would like to call for a vote on the recent discussion regarding
> the
> >> >> switch to libtool.
> >> >> Given the reticences regarding the blackbox behavior libtool, I will
> >> >> commit to implementing a --with(out)-libtool switch to our configure
> >> >> script should issues arise with the libtool builds. Note that in that
> >> >> case I will *not* be supporting building a dso module.
> >> >>
> >> >> +1
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> thomas
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> mapserver-dev mailing list
> >> >> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
> >> >
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mapserver-dev mailing list
> >> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-dev/attachments/20120223/f0d39a0e/attachment.html


More information about the mapserver-dev mailing list