[mapserver-dev] Call for vote on RFC 75: INSPIRE view service support

[Stephen Woodbridge]

Hi Stephan,

+0

Just to let you know I have read through the RFC a couple of times and 
don't see any issues but then, I do not have any background in the 
INSPIRE requirement or operation and didn't think I had anything to add 
one way or the other. But thanks to you and Stefan for your work on this.

-Steve W

On 3/4/2012 6:58 PM, Lime, Steve D (DNR) wrote:
> RFC looks reasonable, implementation looks straightforward albeit
> tedious. Seems like is really doesn't impact the core so much but
> really acts as sophisticated pre-processing. I'll go with a +1 to get
> things rolling.
>
> Steve ________________________________________ From:
> mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] on behalf of Stephan Meißl
> [stephan at meissl.name] Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 9:53 AM To:
> Frank Warmerdam Cc: mapserver-dev; mapserver-inspire Subject: Re:
> [mapserver-dev] Call for vote on RFC 75: INSPIRE view service
> support
>
> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:31 -0800, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Stephan
>> Meißl<stephan at meissl.name>  wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2012-02-05 at 22:31 +0100, Stephan Meißl wrote:
>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to call for a vote on RFC 75: "INSPIRE view
>>>> service support" [1]. There's also a pretty much advanced
>>>> sandbox implementation available [2] for review.
>> ...
>>>> [1] http://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-75.html [2]
>>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/browser/sandbox/inspire_soc2011
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
Hi PSC members,
>>>
>>> did anybody have a look on this RFC?
>>
>> Stephan,
>>
>> I have reviewed it briefly and have no objections though I don't
>> feel savvy enough about the way our WxS services work to give an
>> educated statement on whether it could cause subtle problems.
>>
>> +1 Frank
>
> Frank,
>
> many thanks for your support. To minimize possible problems I'll
> make sure that at least as many tests pass in wxs after the merge
> than do before. But first the RFC would need at least a second +1
> from a PSC member if I understand the guidelines correctly.
>
> cu Stephan
>
>
> _______________________________________________ mapserver-dev mailing
> list mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________ mapserver-dev mailing
> list mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev