[mapserver-dev] MS RFC 88: Saving MapServer Objects to Strings - Call For Vote

[Tamas Szekeres]

I don't mind about the name. This has been suggested by Steve when we I
called for the comments earlier. How do the others like this name?
(Especially Steve and who has already voted on it)

Best regards,

Tamas



2013/2/14 Umberto Nicoletti <umberto.nicoletti at gmail.com>

> toString
> (
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.4.2/docs/api/java/lang/Object.html#toString()
> )
>
> is a predefined method name on all Java objects and while it is common to
> override it and supply a custom implementation I think mapscript
> should leave this last option to the user rather than take it for itself.
> I suggest the method names is changed to: toMapFileString
> before the RFC is approved
>
>
> Umberto
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Jeff McKenna <
> jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> -jeff
>>
>>
>>
>> On 13-02-14 12:14 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
>> > Dear PSC,
>> >
>> > Not requiring to have a large number of pending RFCs out there and
>> > getting no significant requests to change the concept, I motion to vote
>> > on RFC 88 <http://mapserver.org/trunk/development/rfc/ms-rfc-88.html>.
>> >
>> > According to Steve's suggestion I've changed the name of the mapscript
>> > exposed methods to "toString", as the SWIG bindings C#, Java, Python
>> > still compile with success when applying this change.
>> >
>> > I hereby add my +1 to the motion.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Tamas
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapserver-dev mailing list
>> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-dev/attachments/20130214/09384667/attachment.html>