[mapserver-dev] Problems with getMap request and mapCache

[thomas bonfort]

Actually, I believe this was fixed a year ago, c.f.
https://github.com/mapserver/mapcache/commit/25bedb4ebd2897f34233f654f2574d5b3f6fd8f5

--
thomas


On 13 May 2013 10:35, Nash, Edward <E.Nash at dvz-mv.de> wrote:

>  Maybe the other way round? I had a look in WMS1.1.1 and WMS1.3.0, and it
> does appear that service=WMS is only required for the GetCapabilities
> operation: SERVICE is not listed either under the common request parameters
> or the GetMap-specific parameters (and the example requests don’t include
> it).****
>
> ** **
>
> Obviously the majority of clients send the service parameter with every
> request, even though it isn’t required, otherwise this would have been
> spotted before.****
>
>
> Regards,****
>
> ** **
>
> Ed****
>
> ** **
>
> *Von:* mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:
> mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] *Im Auftrag von *thomas bonfort
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 13. Mai 2013 10:24
> *An:* Diego Moreira
> *Cc:* MapServer Dev Mailing List
> *Betreff:* Re: [mapserver-dev] Problems with getMap request and mapCache**
> **
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Diego,****
>
> from what I recall, service=wms is required for wms >= 1.1.0, but not for
> wms 1.0.0 . Anyhow, for mapcache checking that service=wms is present if
> request=getmap is not essential and could be removed. Please open an issue
> for that and I'll take care of it for the next release.****
>
> ** **
>
> cheers,****
>
> thomas****
>
> ** **
>
> On 10 May 2013 21:42, Diego Moreira <moreira.geo at gmail.com> wrote:****
>
> Hi devs,****
>
> ** **
>
> I'm having a problem with mapcache. When I make the request GetMap, I
> receive the following error:****
>
>
> "received wms request with no service param"****
>
> But, according to the OGC specifications, the service param is not needed
> in order to make the request getMap.
>
> Examining the code in the file mapcache/lib/service_wms.c, in the
> function _mapcache_service_wms_parse_request, the service param was
> implemented as if it were needed.
>
> Shouldn't this implementation be corrected? Or am I doing something wrong?
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Abs.****
>
>
>
> Diego Moreira Carvalho
> Geógrafo - CREA: DF19935/D****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev****
>
> ** **
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-dev/attachments/20130513/9bc4389d/attachment-0001.html>