[mapserver-dev] RFC 112: offset FOLLOW labels when self collisions are detected

Stephen Woodbridge woodbri at swoodbridge.com
Fri Dec 12 14:01:20 PST 2014

FYI: I'm +1 on both questions.
And agree the we can add controls later if there is a need.

   -Steve W

On 12/11/2014 6:13 PM, Lime, Steve D (MNIT) wrote:
> Configuration could always be added later if it is determined to be necessary. I agree that not having to fiddle is a good thing and lessens the learning curve.
> So, I'm +1 for the RFC "as is" and +1 for including in 7.0.
> Steve
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Woodbridge
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:31 AM
> To: mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [mapserver-dev] RFC 112: offset FOLLOW labels when self collisions are detected
> On 12/10/2014 3:49 AM, thomas bonfort wrote:
>> Hi Devs,
>> Please have a look at
>> http://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-112.html
>> The RFC is very short and contains an open question as to whether the
>> proposed behavior should be configurable or not (I don't think it
>> needs to be) Given how much the 7.0 release has slipped already, and
>> the limited implications of the change, I would like this to be
>> applied to master before we create 7.0 stable branch.
> This sounds reasonable to me. I like being able to configure things, but I like it better when they just work nicely without a lot of fiddling because it makes it a lot easier for users. So unless there is some great need to have additional configuration parameters I would leave them out.
> Thanks,
>     -Steve W
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev

More information about the mapserver-dev mailing list