[mapserver-dev] Call for discussion on MS RFC 114: Faster retrieval of shape count

[Jeff McKenna]

On 2016-02-08 3:00 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
> Le lundi 08 février 2016 19:48:33, Jeff McKenna a écrit :
>> On 2016-02-08 6:58 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Your comments on the following RFC are welcome :
>>> http://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-114.html
>>>
>>> Even
>>
>> Hi Even,
>>
>> Looks like a nice speed improvement.  My only comment is in the
>> documentation (and also in this RFC document) add a note to refer to the
>> spec reference "WFS TAG Name: resultType (WFS 2.0, sect. 7.6.3.6)"
>>
>> I think it's important to refer to that, to let those users do some
>> background reading to understand this (like I did just now).
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> thanks for the comment.
>
> I was wondering what the "WFS TAG Name" meant here and see it is actually used
> in http://mapserver.org/ogc/wfs_server.html. But in the instances where it is
> used, for example "WFS TAG Name: Abstract (WFS 1.0.0, sect. 12.3.3)", I think
> it means that the metadata is used to fill the value of the <Abstract> tag in
> the GetCapabilities response. Here for resultType which is a request
> parameter, I don't think it makes sense to use this prefix, so perhaps just
> pointing to  "resultType parameter (WFS 2.0, sect. 7.6.3.6)" ?
>
> Even
>

Yes I agree, I realized that after I sent my message.  I agree to just 
point to "resultType parameter (WFS 2.0, sect. 7.6.3.6)" in the RFC and 
docs.

-jeff



-- 
Jeff McKenna
MapServer Consulting and Training Services
http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/