[mapserver-dev] Scale computations for non-square pixels...
Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)
bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us
Tue Jul 24 08:57:12 PDT 2018
I think I would lean towards the larger cellsize. The diagonal approach seems like it might introduce some rounding problems too easily.
Now, one thing to think about here, are those odd-duck users (like myself) who actually do request tall/skinny and low/wide images on purpose for custom map assembly purposes. I’ve done so for building custom map collars and non-square gridding (profiles with different scales) for example. There may also be a need to override (if not already an option) such a setting so as to still get the zoomed-in features to be drawn in these stretched images.
On Jul 24, 2018, at 10:22 AM, Lime, Steve D (MNIT) <steve.lime at state.mn.us<mailto:steve.lime at state.mn.us>> wrote:
Hi all: We have a ticket out there regarding scale computation with non-square pixels (seehttps://github.com/mapserver/mapserver/issues/5625). It should be easy to implement a fix, to the extent it’s possible to come up with a single scale value when that’s
really not the case. Any opinions on what a “best” approach would be? --Steve
mapserver-dev mailing list
mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
"Do, or do not. There is no try."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the mapserver-dev