[mapserver-dev] Motion; adopt RFC 127: Drop (broken) support for builds without GDAL and PROJ

[Seth G]

+1

One question - does the assumption that GDAL is now available allow more benefits of code sharing between the two projects? 
For example some of the utility functions such as one issue in MapServer that had been fixed in GDAL [1], or duplicated drivers. 

[1] https://github.com/mapserver/mapserver/pull/5277

--
web:http://geographika.co.uk
twitter: @geographika

On Thu, Dec 5, 2019, at 6:20 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> having heard no objection, I move to adopt 
> RFC 127: Drop (broken) support for builds without GDAL and PROJ
> 
> https://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-127.html
> 
> Starting with my +1
> 
> Even
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > just formalizing the move I proposed:
> > https://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-127.html
> > 
> > I'll call soon for a vote if hearing no remarks.
> > 
> > Even
> 
> 
> -- 
> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
> http://www.spatialys.com
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev