[Mapserver-inspire] MapServer Inspire doc

[Guillaume Sueur]

Hi Martin,

Choice of scenario only concerns extended capabilities. For the common 
wms/iso19128 capabilities such as fees, access constraints or contact 
information you have to include it in both cases.
The table on page 12 is quite clear about it. Everything mapped to wms: 
is intended to be included in capabilities. The scenario thing only 
deals with the others.

Best regards.

Guillaume

Le 18/05/2011 07:21, Martin Kofahl a écrit :
> Hi Guillaume,
> can you please give some clarification on scenario 1 and 2.
>
> Will a GetCapabilities response be INSPIRE-valid having scenario 1
> extended capabilities only (no mapped metadata to existing tags such as
> Fees, AccessConstraints etc.)? Or does scenario 1/2 refer to the
> extended capabilities only and all other requirements have to be fulfilled?
>
> Thank you,
> Martin
>
> On 20.04.2011 22:43, Guillaume Sueur wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> I've just published the audit document if MapServer against Inspire
>> requirement the french geological survey asked me for.
>>
>> You'll find it here :
>>
>> http://www.neogeo-online.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/MAPSERVER_INSPIRE.pdf
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Guillaume
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mapserver-inspire mailing list
>> Mapserver-inspire at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-inspire
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mapserver-inspire mailing list
> Mapserver-inspire at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-inspire