[Mapserver-users] MapServer performance vs Java servers

Ben Lewis blewis at atsincorp.com
Mon Jan 6 12:10:45 PST 2003


Can anyone speak to performance comparisons (for shape and PostGIS vectors) between MapServer and open source Java servers out there - GeoServer, Degree (JaGo), OpenMap? How about for TIFFs?  One would think java-based servers would be a bit slower, but are they?
 - Ben



-----Original Message-----
From: GAIA [mailto:mapserver at peligroso.gaiaenv.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 6:26 PM
To: Mapserver-users at lists.gis.umn.edu
Subject: Re: [Mapserver-users] Fastest Data Format


Hi all,

I just read my posting, which sounds somewhat curt and it wasn't meant to be.  Shapefiles are nice and quick for the most part and MapServer is still the best solution for us by far.  Having said that, the SDE performance is not up to par with the rest of the application.  As part of our model, we promote multiple applications hitting a common data set.  SDE connectivity is a must as our needs and many of our clients' needs evolve (many of our clients use SDE already), and we were excited to see its inclusion.  

Shapefiles have, for the most part, performed well for us, even with large data sets.  Performance aside, as we and our clients manage larger data sets, the data management convenience of a RDBMS approach is more logical and cost effective.  The volume of tiles can get rediculous with large data sets and multiple clients.  Now, if we could only realise the performance...   


Cheers,
GAIA
_______________________________________________
Mapserver-users mailing list
Mapserver-users at lists.gis.umn.edu
http://lists.gis.umn.edu/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users




More information about the MapServer-users mailing list