[Mapserver-users] the performance in linux against win2k?

[Flavio Hendry]

Hi Chen

We have very similar applications which run on both and we do not see 
tooooo much of a difference (hardware pretty similar):

see:
Windows: http://www.mapserver.ch/waedenswil/index_e.phtml
Uses MapInfo as source which supposedly should be slower then Shape 
(and contains far more data then the one below)

Linux: http://www.mapsonlinux.ch/graubuenden_online/index.phtml
(click on "Ortsplan Andeer", German only) Uses Shape ...

ciao
Flavio

-----Original Message-----
From: Chen Fu <novalet at yahoo.com.cn>
To: mapserver-users at lists.gis.umn.edu
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 10:17:19 +0800 (CST)
Subject: [Mapserver-users] the performance in linux against win2k?

> Hi!
> I recently use mapserver as cgi with win2k+appache. It
> works nice.
> But i read from some articles that creating process in
> win2k+appache is relatively slow than linux, so cgi is
> not a good solution in win2k. Is it right? 
> Will it benefit a lot if i setup a linux in the same
> pc to replace win2k?
> Thank you in advance!
> 
> =====
> Remote Scensing Satellite Ground Station
> Chinese Academy of Science
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!? 
> Á÷Á¬ÍøÂçÊÀ½çµÄ¡°Ä㡱ÊÇË­£¿
> http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/?http://cn.surveys.yahoo.com/cn_us
> er_profile_study_may2003
> _______________________________________________
> Mapserver-users mailing list
> Mapserver-users at lists.gis.umn.edu
> http://lists.gis.umn.edu/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users