pramsey at REFRACTIONS.NET
Mon Dec 26 23:35:31 EST 2005
There's also an error in the document (which is not surprising, since
the MySQL documentation on spatial is a little misleading, with most
all of the OGC functions documented when only the constructors and
accessors are actually fully implemented) which indicates that MySQL
When it actually does not.
On 26-Dec-05, at 7:16 PM, Gregory S. Williamson wrote:
> This seems to cover most of the major issues, although I'd point
> out that the speed difference between the two is mostly obvious
> when running single (or only a few) connections to the database; if
> you need something that can support dozens / scores (or more) of
> simultaneous connections the speed difference is markedly less, and
> sometimes is reversed with Postgres showing an advantage.
> Greg Williamson
> GlobeXplorer LLC.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: UMN MapServer Users List on behalf of Shoaib Burq
> Sent: Mon 12/26/2005 5:46 PM
> To: MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU
> Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] mysql?
> Last year I was ask by my manager to compare the spatial capabilities
> of Postgres and mysql.
> See attached the report I gave him... it was a 1 hour job. so no
More information about the mapserver-users