jpeg quality

[Matthew Smith]

Bart van den Eijnden wrote:
> There was a similar thread about this recently. Check the archives for
"raster : bad quality in output"
>
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=mapserver-users&X=-


I just followed this up as I was also unimpressed with the JPEG quality (but
not half as much as I'm unimpressed by user agents that don't handle PNG ;-)

I searched on the words "raster" and "quality", separately and in
conjunction in both body and subject and got nothing back - is the search
engine broken?

Cheers

M

--
Matthew Smith
Kadina Business Consultancy
South Australia
http://www.kbc.net.au