WMS 1.3.0 in MapServer?

[Kralidis,Tom [Burlington]]

I thought IONIC supported it as well; I can't see much who implement or
comply with WMS 1.3.0 on the OGC pages:

http://www.opengeospatial.org/resources/?page=products&view=listbyspec&c
onf=0&specid=97



> -----Original Message-----
> From: UMN MapServer Users List 
> [mailto:MAPSERVER-USERS at lists.umn.edu] On Behalf Of Bart van 
> den Eijnden (OSGIS)
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 10:32 AM
> To: MAPSERVER-USERS at lists.umn.edu
> Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] WMS 1.3.0 in MapServer?
> 
> 
> Cubewerx supports it. But that's one of the very few (if not 
> the only one).
> 
> Here in Europe the INSPIRE project's standards are most 
> likely gonna be 
> based on WMS 1.3, so I am sure the demand for it will be 
> growing eventually.
> 
> Best regards,
> Bart
> 
> Andrew Larcombe wrote:
> 
> > Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> >
> >> if someone wants to pay for it, but I'm personally so pissed off at
> >> the WMS
> >> RWG for this pointless churn that am unlikely to work on 
> it for the joy
> >> of supporting standards.
> >
> >
> > I'm with you there.
> >
> >>
> >> I don't know the other subtle issues.
> >>
> >> If there is a demand for WMS 1.3.0 support (not much 
> outcry so far) 
> >> then it would be helpful to collect funding to get DM Solutions or 
> >> MapGears to implement it.  Or someone else keen and 
> trusted could do 
> >> so.
> >
> >
> > I recently had a client who 'needed' a 1.3.0 WMS server solution.
> > Turns out they didn't actually 'need' any of the new facilities and 
> > could settle for 1.1.1. At the time (~2 months ago?), I couldn't 
> > actually find *any* servers that were supporting it. My 
> guess is the 
> > client just found out what the latest version # was and 
> said "that's 
> > what we need to go with". :(
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bart van den Eijnden
> OSGIS, Open Source GIS
> http://www.osgis.nl
>