WMS 1.3.0 in MapServer?

[Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS)]

Hi Tom,

Ionic does not support it in the current version (RSW 3.3).

Maybe in the upcoming RSW 3.4 release.

Best regards,
Bart

Kralidis,Tom [Burlington] wrote:

>I thought IONIC supported it as well; I can't see much who implement or
>comply with WMS 1.3.0 on the OGC pages:
>
>http://www.opengeospatial.org/resources/?page=products&view=listbyspec&c
>onf=0&specid=97
>
>
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: UMN MapServer Users List 
>>[mailto:MAPSERVER-USERS at lists.umn.edu] On Behalf Of Bart van 
>>den Eijnden (OSGIS)
>>Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 10:32 AM
>>To: MAPSERVER-USERS at lists.umn.edu
>>Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] WMS 1.3.0 in MapServer?
>>
>>
>>Cubewerx supports it. But that's one of the very few (if not 
>>the only one).
>>
>>Here in Europe the INSPIRE project's standards are most 
>>likely gonna be 
>>based on WMS 1.3, so I am sure the demand for it will be 
>>growing eventually.
>>
>>Best regards,
>>Bart
>>
>>Andrew Larcombe wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Frank Warmerdam wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>if someone wants to pay for it, but I'm personally so pissed off at
>>>>the WMS
>>>>RWG for this pointless churn that am unlikely to work on 
>>>>        
>>>>
>>it for the joy
>>    
>>
>>>>of supporting standards.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>I'm with you there.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>I don't know the other subtle issues.
>>>>
>>>>If there is a demand for WMS 1.3.0 support (not much 
>>>>        
>>>>
>>outcry so far) 
>>    
>>
>>>>then it would be helpful to collect funding to get DM Solutions or 
>>>>MapGears to implement it.  Or someone else keen and 
>>>>        
>>>>
>>trusted could do 
>>    
>>
>>>>so.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>I recently had a client who 'needed' a 1.3.0 WMS server solution.
>>>Turns out they didn't actually 'need' any of the new facilities and 
>>>could settle for 1.1.1. At the time (~2 months ago?), I couldn't 
>>>actually find *any* servers that were supporting it. My 
>>>      
>>>
>>guess is the 
>>    
>>
>>>client just found out what the latest version # was and 
>>>      
>>>
>>said "that's 
>>    
>>
>>>what we need to go with". :(
>>>
>>>Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>-- 
>>Bart van den Eijnden
>>OSGIS, Open Source GIS
>>http://www.osgis.nl
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>  
>


-- 
Bart van den Eijnden
OSGIS, Open Source GIS
http://www.osgis.nl