GD vs AGG performance...

[thomas bonfort]

john,
could you be more specific as to what kind of maps you're rendering, in the
terms of the number and type of layers, and approximate number of features
per layer.
the agg stuff is "just working" for the moment , without much thought on
optimization. having a few pointers as to where to look for the possible
optimisations would be helpfull.

tb

On 8/23/07, John Cole <john.cole at uai.com> wrote:
>
> Perhaps it's too early to discuss performance differences, but I was
> curious
> if the current AGG rendering speed is what to expect.
>
> Looking at a few of my mapfiles, AGG is aprox 5 times slower than GD on
> MS5
> (with MS4 GD just a hair faster than MS5 GD).
>
> The maps look great, but after spending a lot of time getting maps below
> 100ms, it's hurts to see them over a second again :-(  Just want my cake
> and
> get to eat it too :-)
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/GD-vs-AGG-performance...-tf4319265.html#a12299688
> Sent from the Mapserver - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20070823/f4768de2/attachment.htm>