[mapserver-users] Mapserver equivalent for .NET

[Tamas Szekeres]

I'm not aware of any compelling reason to switch to a more restrictive
license. However I personally don't think it's derogatory for a
project to expose which open source libraries it depends on.

Best regards,

Tamas


2008/2/29, Tim Bowden <tim.bowden at westnet.com.au>:
>
>  On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 09:52 +0100, Milo van der Linden wrote:
>  > Given the fact that MpaDtoNte is commercial, it is probably not an
>  > alternative. :-P
>  >
>  > About using Mapserver under the hood; shameless! These guys should
>  > recieve punishment!
>  > They should be forced to donate to the mapserver project and show the
>  > mapserver logo everywhere. ;-)
>
>
> <stirring the pot>
>  I thought mapserver was distributed under a license that specifically
>  and deliberately allowed this.  If this is considered undesirable,
>  shouldn't it be released under a less permissive license?
>
>
>  Tim Bowden
>
>
>  >
>  > Daniel Morissette schreef:
>  > > Matt M wrote:
>  > >> Anyone know of a .NET equivalent of Mapserver?
>  > >>
>  > >
>  > > Plesae dnot' tlel aynnoe, but MpaDtoNet hsa MpaSreevr udern teh hood.
>  > > I wshi tehy wree mroe opne atuob tihs.  ;)
>  > > _______________________________________________
>  > > mapserver-users mailing list
>  > > mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
>  > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>  > >
>  >
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > mapserver-users mailing list
>  > mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
>  > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  mapserver-users mailing list
>  mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
>  http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>