[mapserver-users] Label alignment . . .

[Bob Basques]

All,

Sorry about the links in the previous Email (again), geez I don't know 
what's going on at work, but here are the real links:

https://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/datasets/SHP/FED/USGS/USNG/mn_usng_lines_labels_2_public.map?mapext=503179.6728349806+111379.8994326578+508281.0020239575+135621.41573867595&mapsize=70+600&mode=map&MOOSETIME=1241653121858

https://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/datasets/SHP/FED/USGS/USNG/mn_usng_lines_labels_2b_public.map?mapext=503179.6728349806+111379.8994326578+508281.0020239575+135621.41573867595&mapsize=70+600&mode=map&MOOSETIME=1241653121858

bobb



Bob Basques wrote:
>
> All,
>
>
> Ok, I made some progress, sort of.
>
>
> I started out here:
>
>
> _/http://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/datasets/SHP/FED/USGS/USNG/mn_usng_lines_labels_2_public.map?mapext=503179.6728349806%20111379.8994326578%20508281.0020239575%20135621.41573867595&mapsize=70%20600&mode=map&MOOSETIME=1241653121858/_ 
> <http://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/datasets/SHP/FED/USGS/USNG/mn_usng_lines_labels_2_public.map?mapext=503179.6728349806%20111379.8994326578%20508281.0020239575%20135621.41573867595&mapsize=70%20600&mode=map&MOOSETIME=1241653121858> 
>
>
>
> The three labels get justified ok horizontally in relation to each 
> other, but they don't line up vertically, which is what I'm after, so 
> . . .
>
>
> I had a thought about using "ANGLE follow" instead of "ANGLE 0" and 
> then I get this:
>
>
> _/http://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/datasets/SHP/FED/USGS/USNG/mn_usng_lines_labels_2b_public.map?mapext=503179.6728349806%20111379.8994326578%20508281.0020239575%20135621.41573867595&mapsize=70%20600&mode=map&MOOSETIME=1241653121858/_ 
> <http://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/datasets/SHP/FED/USGS/USNG/mn_usng_lines_labels_2b_public.map?mapext=503179.6728349806%20111379.8994326578%20508281.0020239575%20135621.41573867595&mapsize=70%20600&mode=map&MOOSETIME=1241653121858> 
>
>
>
> Now the vertical alignment is nice and straight, but the OFFSETs are 
> ignored for the two outside (larger text) labels for the line.  Should 
> the OFFSET parameter be ignored with "ANGLE follow"?
>
>
> I could use this with three different images side by side, but it 
> would be nicer to just have one image . . . .
>
>
> Thanks for any ideas . . . . Still putzing with it . . .
>
>
> bobb
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20090508/b6777355/attachment.html