[mapserver-users] Mapserver / Mapcache performance question - file format
Mark Volz
MarkVolz at co.lyon.mn.us
Thu Aug 9 07:37:54 PDT 2012
Hello,
I am optimize a cache in mapcache that uses mapserver to create images for an air photo service. I was just wondering if I could get some feedback about optimizing the service. Here is what I have thus far:
* All of the images and services are in a single projection
* The Original four images are in a compresses geotiff file. (The uncompressed geotiffs are too large)
* Tileindexes and Overviews were built using gdal at the same resolutions that mapcache will use.
* A shapefile tile index was created
* My Mapfile uses PROCESSING "OVERSAMPLE_RATIO =1.0", "GDAL_FORCE_CACHING =YES" and "RESAMPLE=NEAREST"
* Mapserver is serving tiff files
* Mapcache is using a 4*4 metatile - I am assuming that this will make about four instances of mapserver run at once, which matches the number of cores I have. Would it be quicker to use a 16* 16 metatile so that mapserver only needs to open the image once?
* I am serving the cache in a jpeg, which should keep the cache size small, and the bandwidth down as well.
* Each tile is 256*256. I have also seen 512*512 tiles, but I think 256 seems quicker.
I appreciate any thoughts. Thanks
Mark Volz
GIS Specialist
p.s. I noticed PROCESSING "OVERSAMPLE_RATIO =1.0" makes a big difference, however I could not find the parameter in any of the official documentation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20120809/1446e1d3/attachment.htm>
More information about the MapServer-users
mailing list