[mapserver-users] Re: polygon border artifacts
Lime, Steve D (DNR)
Steve.Lime at state.mn.us
Thu May 10 08:06:47 PDT 2012
They'd actually be more pronounced if that were the case. PNG24 doesn't show 'em either.
-----Original Message-----
From: mapserver-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapserver-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Rahkonen Jukka
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:51 AM
To: 'mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org'
Subject: Re: [mapserver-users] Re: polygon border artifacts
Hi,
Perhaps PNG8 does not have enough many colours for showing the artifacts?
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Lime, Steve wrote:
> I'm unable to recreate the artifact with a simple test case though so
> I'm not exactly sure what's going wrong. This mapfile defines a couple
> of overlapping polygons and there is no rendering issue.
>
> MAP
> SIZE 512 512
>
> IMAGETYPE PNG8
>
> EXTENT 0 0 1000 1000
> IMAGECOLOR 255 0 0
>
> LAYER
> NAME "test"
> TYPE POLYGON
> STATUS DEFAULT
> FEATURE
> POINTS 100 100 600 100 600 600 100 600 100 100 END
> END
> FEATURE
> POINTS 300 70 800 70 800 800 300 800 300 70 END
> END
> CLASS
> STYLE
> COLOR 128 255 255
> # OUTLINECOLOR 0 0 0
> END
> END # of class
> END # of layer
> END
>
> Online at:
> http://maps1.dnr.state.mn.us/cgi-bin/mapserv60?map=/usr/local/
mapserver/apps/test/ocean/test4.map&mode=map
> Your original test case (+labels):
> http://maps1.dnr.state.mn.us/cgi-bin/mapserv60?map=/usr/local/
mapserver/apps/test/ocean/test.map&mode=map
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapserver-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:mapserver-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Sven
> Geggus
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 8:18 AM
> To: mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: [mapserver-users] Re: polygon border artifacts
>
> "Lime, Steve D (DNR)" <Steve.Lime at state.mn.us> wrote:
>
> > Do outlines fix things at all zoom levels?
>
> Not really. The Workaround which is working best for now is using a
> very big polygon Overlap of 100Meters (Talking about Google Mercator
> here) which I feel is way to much and an outline with of 1. To
> completely get rid of artifacts I would need an Outline width of 2,
> but this is not small enough IMO.
>
> > What about the possibility of fixing the data?
>
> The bug is clearly with mapserver here, the data is fine IMO.
> The tool used for generation of the tiles does already allow for
> generation of arbitrary overlap widths
> (https://github.com/joto/osmcoastline/).
>
> > I mean, unioning the ocean polys into one, or better yet
> deriving land
> > polygons from that data.
>
> No, unfortunately both of them are not an Option!
>
> 1. Unioning the polygons:
> I presented a small shapefile just to demonstrate the problem.
> The original file I want to use contains ocean tiles covering the
> whole world. So this has been spitted into tiles for a reason!
>
> 2. Land polygons:
> These are also not an option because I want to use the ocean tiles to
> cover inaccurate hillshading derived from srtm. This will not work the
> other way round.
>
> The only thing I could imagine as a solution on the data side would be
> the clipping of the hillshades by means of the polygon shape.
>
> Regards
>
> Sven
>
> --
> TCP/IP: telecommunication protocol for imbibing pilsners
> (Man-page uubp(1C) on Debian/GNU Linux)
>
> /me is giggls at ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
> _______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
More information about the MapServer-users
mailing list