[mapserver-users] MAXSCALEDENOM : different values between two servers

[Fernando Norte]

I'd tryed... There is no change.
If I change the value of RESOLUTION from 72 to other like 96 (or even
trying another crazy numbers like 0.0072 or 7200) the only thing that
change is the size of lines, labels, and make a worse mess.
But the layers is still showing in all scales.

Can the WMS influence on this?
Because I'm working with a WMS to be showed with OpenLayers (same files and
versions too).



 *Fernando Norte*

Desenvolvedor SIGWeb

tel.(31) 2533.9900

cel.(31) 9119.8814

skype: fernandoglobalgeo

Endereço: Alameda do Ingá, 88, 6º andar, Vale do Sereno

Nova Lima/MG - CEP: 34.000-000

www.globalgeo.com.br

"O presente documento pode conter material confidencial ou seu sigilo é
protegido por lei.
Quaisquer informações nele contida são destinadas exclusivamente ao(s)
seu(s) destinatário(s)
não devendo em nenhuma hipótese ser repassado a terceiros".



2013/3/28 Fawcett, David (MNIT) <David.Fawcett at state.mn.us>

>  You could try to explicitly set the RESOLUTION to see if that makes a
> difference.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* mapserver-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:
> mapserver-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *Fernando Norte
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 28, 2013 8:17 AM
> *To:* Lime, Steve D (MNIT)
> *Cc:* mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> *Subject:* Re: [mapserver-users] MAXSCALEDENOM : different values between
> two servers****
>
> ** **
>
> yeap... same mapfile, just a copy.
> I guess it might be about some pre-defined value envolved in scale
> resolution calc, but don't make any idea what it is or/and how to set. ***
> *
>
> ** **
>
> thanks,****
>
>
> ****
>
> *Fernando Norte*****
>
> Desenvolvedor SIGWeb****
>
> tel.(31) 2533.9900****
>
> cel.(31) 9119.8814****
>
> skype: fernandoglobalgeo****
>
> ****
>
> Endereço: Alameda do Ingá, 88, 6º andar, Vale do Sereno****
>
> Nova Lima/MG - CEP: 34.000-000****
>
> *www.globalgeo.com.br* <http://www.globalgeo.com.br/>****
>
> "O presente documento pode conter material confidencial ou seu sigilo é
> protegido por lei.
> Quaisquer informações nele contida são destinadas exclusivamente ao(s)
> seu(s) destinatário(s)
> não devendo em nenhuma hipótese ser repassado a terceiros".****
>
> ** **
>
> 2013/3/27 Lime, Steve D (MNIT) <Steve.Lime at state.mn.us>****
>
> Exact same mapfile? ****
>
> ** **
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* mapserver-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [
> mapserver-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] on behalf of Fernando Norte [
> fernando at globalgeo.com.br]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 27, 2013 9:48 AM
> *To:* mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> *Subject:* [mapserver-users] MAXSCALEDENOM : different values between two
> servers****
>
> Hello, ****
>
> ** **
>
> I have a problem using the MAXSCALEDENOM when transfer to a differnet
> server.****
>
> I developed localy, testing etc, and then send to another remote server.**
> **
>
> The problem is: ****
>
> In my local machine I use, for example, a value to MAXSCALEDENOM 6500000
> (1:6.5M)****
>
> This was not working in my remote server, then I found that if this scale
> is divided by 100000 works fine: MAXSCALEDENOM 65****
>
> ** **
>
> Since the both using MapServer version 6, booth are Linux, what should
> happen to this scale change?****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
>
> ****
>
> *Fernando Norte*****
>
> Desenvolvedor SIGWeb****
>
> tel.(31) 2533.9900****
>
> cel.(31) 9119.8814****
>
> skype: fernandoglobalgeo****
>
> ****
>
> Endereço: Alameda do Ingá, 88, 6º andar, Vale do Sereno****
>
> Nova Lima/MG - CEP: 34.000-000****
>
> *www.globalgeo.com.br* <http://www.globalgeo.com.br/>****
>
> "O presente documento pode conter material confidencial ou seu sigilo é
> protegido por lei.
> Quaisquer informações nele contida são destinadas exclusivamente ao(s)
> seu(s) destinatário(s)
> não devendo em nenhuma hipótese ser repassado a terceiros".****
>
> ** **
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20130328/05405713/attachment-0001.html>