[Marketing] New draft logos

Arnulf Christl arnulf.christl at wheregroup.com
Sun Mar 23 23:54:34 EDT 2008

On Wed, March 12, 2008 20:14, Jason Birch wrote:
> Arnulf wrote:
>> I like version 3b.
> I don't really have a vote, but I like 3b too, and would second your
> motion and +1 if I was on the committee :)

OK, so we have yet another vote for the new spiky logo.

Even although you are not on the committee officially - what do you think
of loosening our tight grip on the logo a little as proposed?

> On the other pages, I like the smaller text, left justified, and the
> thinner ring.  Specifically:
> Page 2: 1a, 2a
> Page 3: 1a, 2d, 2e, 2f
> I prefer that the inner star match the outer band colour (which would be
> a modification of 1a and 2a on page 2, and 1a on page 3), but could be
> convinced that it makes more sense for it to stay green.

I also think that the overall color should stay green.

> That GRASS logo is great, and similarly tasteful modifications of the
> OSGeo logo would be awesome to see.  However, I _really_ think that for
> brand protection we need an ND clause on our logo to prevent nasty
> derivatives.  Perhaps we could have a process to integrate creative works
> into our website somewhere?  Google does something like this:
> http://www.google.com/customlogos.html   (probably hasn't been updated
> in ages)
> But I like this one best:
> http://www.evisibility.com/blog/say-hello-to-the-new-google-bot-logo/
> Jason

So if we really want to open this up a bit what do you think of setting up
a Wiki page for people to add derivatives (this term gets me thinking that
we might want to actually 'license' the logo?). I imagine that nothing
much would happen at all. We are all busy enough and the user base might
be just slightly smaller than Google's...

Arnulf Christl

More information about the Marketing mailing list