[Marketing] component 2 website review

[Jody Garnett]

Reminder - we need to follow up on this, it is our last remaining activity
for the website/rebranding initiative.

--
Jody Garnett

On 13 October 2017 at 13:17, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com> wrote:

> Website crew:
>
> If you are available for this activity it would be good to have our
> content story straight so we can confirm component 2 is delivered and plan
> for community engagement and delivery.
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 8 October 2017 at 12:33, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So this is the big one, in part because it is a review for both Get
>> Interactive (any missing functionality or migrated content) and for our
>> OSGeo contributors (and missing content we need to write).
>>
>> Get Interactive is well in hand with a short list of "bugs":
>> https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Abug
>>
>> For our OSGeo contributors we have a number of content issues we can
>> address with the tools provided: https://github.com/O
>> SGeo/osgeo/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Acontent
>>
>> And "help wanted" issues where functionality is stuck waiting on our
>> contributors or direction: https://github.com/
>> OSGeo/osgeo/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22help+wanted%22
>>
>> Priorities for this week:
>>
>> 1) I have a hangout today with Marc (hi Marc where are you!) to go over
>> the "content inventory and site map":
>> ​
>>  Content Inventory and Site Map
>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n5WzCqURZHTpkxV8DwqxOw56EVNuo53hHMyMeIYJ-Xg/edit?usp=drive_web>
>> ​
>> This is a short list of all the content that needed to be migrated or
>> written for the website. In last week's meeting we did a quick pass to
>> verify what content migration has occurred (all the news items yay!). This
>> needs to be double checked, creating a "bug" or "content" issue for
>> anything that is missing.
>>
>> 2) Get Interactive is squashing outstanding bugs and sending out a
>> feedback survey. Some of the issues, like how to handle location, may be
>> tricky.
>>
>> 3) Resolve hosting issue with SAC, it appears as if there is an Oct 10th
>> meeting taking shape. I am not sure if we have managed to communicated to
>> SAC members that the website is not ready yet (nor likely to be until
>> hosting and access is resolved allowing our members to complete a round of
>> writing).
>>
>> So what are we missing here? A strategy for handling enhancements
>> requested by our community, either already reported to github, or via
>> feedback survey being sent out after issues resolved. While we have our
>> hands full confirming content please consider what you would like to see
>> happen.
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20171105/fb0d7566/attachment.html>