[Marketing] component 2 website review

[Jody Garnett]

Website crew:

If you are available for this activity it would be good to have our content
story straight so we can confirm component 2 is delivered and plan for
community engagement and delivery.

--
Jody Garnett

On 8 October 2017 at 12:33, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com> wrote:

> So this is the big one, in part because it is a review for both Get
> Interactive (any missing functionality or migrated content) and for our
> OSGeo contributors (and missing content we need to write).
>
> Get Interactive is well in hand with a short list of "bugs":
> https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Abug
>
> For our OSGeo contributors we have a number of content issues we can
> address with the tools provided: https://github.com/
> OSGeo/osgeo/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Acontent
>
> And "help wanted" issues where functionality is stuck waiting on our
> contributors or direction: https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/issues?q=is%
> 3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22help+wanted%22
>
> Priorities for this week:
>
> 1) I have a hangout today with Marc (hi Marc where are you!) to go over
> the "content inventory and site map":
> ​
>  Content Inventory and Site Map
> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n5WzCqURZHTpkxV8DwqxOw56EVNuo53hHMyMeIYJ-Xg/edit?usp=drive_web>
> ​
> This is a short list of all the content that needed to be migrated or
> written for the website. In last week's meeting we did a quick pass to
> verify what content migration has occurred (all the news items yay!). This
> needs to be double checked, creating a "bug" or "content" issue for
> anything that is missing.
>
> 2) Get Interactive is squashing outstanding bugs and sending out a
> feedback survey. Some of the issues, like how to handle location, may be
> tricky.
>
> 3) Resolve hosting issue with SAC, it appears as if there is an Oct 10th
> meeting taking shape. I am not sure if we have managed to communicated to
> SAC members that the website is not ready yet (nor likely to be until
> hosting and access is resolved allowing our members to complete a round of
> writing).
>
> So what are we missing here? A strategy for handling enhancements
> requested by our community, either already reported to github, or via
> feedback survey being sent out after issues resolved. While we have our
> hands full confirming content please consider what you would like to see
> happen.
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20171013/e9c7abb6/attachment.html>