[Marketing] Website review
Cameron Shorter
cameron.shorter at gmail.com
Tue May 1 04:48:38 PDT 2018
I'll add that we have lost the contents of the extensive list of OSGeo
Advocates we had at: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Advocate
And as per a prior email thread, our OSGeo Incubation processes are now
hard to find and not linked into the main docs.
On 28/4/18 1:55 am, Jody Garnett wrote:
> For functionality issues we do have some support from get interactive
> for the first year. I think the search not working would be worth
> following up on.
>
> For new features we have some budget, currently the GeoForAll
> committee is working with get interactive to migrate some of their
> resources from the previous website.
>
> The biggest feature I am missing is the ability to "link" to the
> results of filters - this is holding up the ability have a list of
> voting members.
>
> Some good direction from the board and CRO is to:
> a) Use LDAP for the wiki, so everyone can use the same OSGEO userid
> for the website and wiki. This should help with profiles.
> b) The use of the members list to manage voting members, since the
> list has gotten too long for CRO to track
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
>
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 at 07:59, Steven Feldman <shfeldman at gmail.com
> <mailto:shfeldman at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> A quick scan of the web site suggests that multiple content
> creators are possibly a source of inconsistency in the way we do
> things.
>
> For example - on the resources tab we have an enormous number of
> pdfs uploaded by geo for all, this is going to get out of control
> unless we offer better filtering and some archiving. The search
> and filter don’t seem to work for me but that might be a safari
> thing (don’t have time to test with another browser right now).
> Alternatively we could encourage them to host their newsletters on
> their web site and just provide one link in the resources section
> of the OSGeo web site
>
> Initiatives seem to be proliferating (I acknowledge my own small
> bit of responsibility here) - that may be a great thing but should
> someone be deciding what constitutes an initiative that should
> appear on the web site? Maybe the marketing committee does do this?
>
> Member bios are inconsistent, some do not have photos some do not
> have any content apart from a couple of ticks in projects e.g.
> https://www.osgeo.org/member/pawley/.
>
> The member search also returns some unexpected results e.g. Jo
> Cook, Ian Turton and Matt Walker (friends and colleagues of mine)
> all have Astun Technology in their bios and under the ‘company’
> field, I have Astun Technology in bio:
>
> * if you search for Astun only Jo’s name is returned
> * If you search for Astun Technology none of our names are returned
>
>
> The service providers section shows 9 logos on the first page
> (with loads of follow on pages- it appears that these first 9 are
> not randomly selected, this could cause some upset. Filtering by
> location takes you to a nightmare dropdown which IMO needs
> cleaning up. Surely the location filter should be at country level
> or perhaps in the US at state but not at individual towns/cities
> where people are located?
>
> There is a lot of news being posted which is great but it appears
> in 9 large blocks with 63 follow on pages! Perhaps we need to look
> at a way of presenting more news items on the front page and also
> a way of accessing past news by having a date filter or selector?
> Are there any criteria as to what constitutes OSGeo news
> (community and foundation) and who can post?
>
> Nothing disastrous in these observations but perhaps an indication
> of how the site could become unwieldy and inconsistent in
> behaviour and content if we don’t try to set some policies or
> guidelines now.
>
> Cheers
> ______
> Steven
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Marketing mailing list
> Marketing at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Marketing at lists.osgeo.org>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Marketing mailing list
> Marketing at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
--
Cameron Shorter
Technology Demystifier, Learnosity
Open Technologies Consultant
M +61 (0) 419 142 254
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20180501/ca445754/attachment.html>
More information about the Marketing
mailing list