[MetaCRS] Proj4js 1.0.0 release candidate 1
Frank Warmerdam
warmerdam at pobox.com
Tue Oct 7 14:12:32 EDT 2008
Richard Greenwood wrote:
>> I understand, but the intention was that we would try and have just
>> one MetaCRS PSC to cover all the component projects - mostly just
>> resolving issues in case of a failure to reach consensus.
>
> I guess I'm confused. When I declined your invitation to join the
> MetaCRS PSC I assumed that the MetaCRS PSC was comprised of
> representative(s) of the constituent project PSCs. Proj4js does not
> have a PSC.
Richard,
The MetaCRS PSC is the PSC for all the component projects, though it
tries to use a "light hand" as long as the contributors to a sub-project
are reaching consensus themselves on technical directions.
>> I think proj4js would benefit from a third contributor that might act
>> as a moderating influence to help reach consensus. But contributors
>> are hard to create out of thin air. :-(
>
> Agreed.
>
>> But my suggestion stands to write up your proposed changes, and if you
>> can't reach consensus on the proj4js mailing list (is there one?)
>
> No, the Proj4js wiki lists this list as the Proj4js list.
I'd be happy to create a proj4js mailing list if there is no objection.
Somewhere specifically for the technical discussions of proj4js,
and user support.
Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent
More information about the MetaCRS
mailing list