[MetaCRS] EPSG 4269

[Boring, Thomas]

Frank & Hugues,

Thanks for the confirmation & explanation.

Thanks,

Tom Boring
Programmer \ Analyst III
Information Services Department (ISD) - Team 8
GIS Application Development Team
County of San Bernardino

Confidentiality Notice: This communication contains confidential information sent solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, you are not authorized to use it in any manner, except to immediately destroy it and notify the sender.


From: Hugues Wisniewski [mailto:hugues.wisniewski at autodesk.com]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 6:52 AM
To: Frank Warmerdam (External); Boring, Thomas
Cc: metacrs at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [MetaCRS] EPSG 4269

Hi Tom,

Following Frank's answer, I just found this ticket logged 22 months ago:
http://trac.osgeo.org/metacrs/ticket/3

CS-Map uses these values:
        MIN_LNG: 194 21 00W
        MAX_LNG:  45 44 00W
        MIN_LAT:  12 56 00N
        MAX_LAT:  88 27 00N

Spatial Reference shows
-52.0000, 14.2500, 172.0000, 83.2000

If these values were set like that, that would be the equivalent of:
        MIN_LNG: 186W
        MAX_LNG:  52W
        MIN_LAT:  14 30 00N
        MAX_LAT:  83 12 00N

On http://www.epsg-registry.org/ EPSG shows
West Bound Longitude 167.65
East Bound Longitude -47.74
North Bound Latitude 86.45
South Bound Latitude 14.93

Hugues


From: metacrs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:metacrs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> [mailto:metacrs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Frank Warmerdam
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 11:48 PM
To: Boring, Thomas
Cc: metacrs at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:metacrs at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [MetaCRS] EPSG 4269

Tim,

I believe that spatialreference.org<http://spatialreference.org> is representing the latitude range inverted, presumable due to confusion about dateline crossing boxes.

Best regards,
Frank


On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Boring, Thomas <tboring at isd.sbcounty.gov<mailto:tboring at isd.sbcounty.gov>> wrote:

Are the bounds indicated for epsg projection 4269 (http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/4269/) correct?  Shouldn't they be centered on North America rather than Europe & Asia?



Thanks,


Tom Boring
Programmer \ Analyst III
Information Services Department (ISD) - Team 8
GIS Application Development Team
County of San Bernardino

Confidentiality Notice: This communication contains confidential information sent solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, you are not authorized to use it in any manner, except to immediately destroy it and notify the sender.

_______________________________________________
MetaCRS mailing list
MetaCRS at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:MetaCRS at lists.osgeo.org>
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/metacrs



--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com<mailto:warmerdam at pobox.com>
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Software Developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/metacrs/attachments/20130603/93a6aabb/attachment-0001.html>