[Journal] Another long article - opinions?

[Tyler Mitchell]

On 4-Apr-07, at 8:44 AM, Markus Neteler wrote:

> On 4/4/07, Micha Silver <micha at arava.co.il> wrote:
>> I also would not limit the overall size of the Journal. But I  
>> would say
>> that 10 pages is too long for one article. It just won't get read.
>
> I agree - 10 pages would appear somehow unbalanced (although
> it is a great effort!).
>
>> How about asking Daniel Ames if he can split it into two (or three?)
>> installments, and publish only part 1 now, leaving part 2 for  
>> volume 2?
>> That's a popular and accepted way to present long, complicated  
>> topics in
>> online journals.
>
> This sounds like a good idea, if the article contents permit a split.

I agree and will ask for this after having a look at the content myself.

By the way, I see you are responding to Micha's email (above) by I  
don't actually have a copy of that email.  I'm afraid I might be  
losing emails somehow :[