[Journal] Another long article - opinions?

[Markus Neteler]

On 4/4/07, Micha Silver <micha at arava.co.il> wrote:
> I also would not limit the overall size of the Journal. But I would say
> that 10 pages is too long for one article. It just won't get read.

I agree - 10 pages would appear somehow unbalanced (although
it is a great effort!).

> How about asking Daniel Ames if he can split it into two (or three?)
> installments, and publish only part 1 now, leaving part 2 for volume 2?
> That's a popular and accepted way to present long, complicated topics in
> online journals.

This sounds like a good idea, if the article contents permit a split.

Markus