[Journal] 2012 Annual Report

[Landon Blake]

Eli:

I made an SVN commit. I'm not sure how many of my changes got through
because my working copy was out of date, but it looks like the only
conflict was with the Romanian Chapter. I'll see if I can get that conflict
resolved and then I'll look at your other comments. I'll try to do this
before the end of the work week.

Landon

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Landon Blake
> <sunburned.surveyor at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Eli asked me to wrap up the final edits to the 2012 Annual Report. Here
> are
> > his comments and my changes:
>
> The first comment was that I fixed many minor things in svn in
> revision https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/changeset/11997/.  I don't see
> those changes reflected in this most recent attachment.  I also don't
> see any of your updates in svn.  I'm under the impression that we are
> collaboratively working on Journal development just like source code
> so we would svn update, then make changes, then svn commit.  Seeing
> diffs also makes it easier to see what changes have been made rather
> than trying to look at everything again.
>
> The rest of these comments were things that I couldn't fix myself in
> the sources.
>
> >
> > 1. Almost no urls are linked.  I don't know if urls are supposed to be
> > blue hyperlinks or not.  If they are not, then they should be spelled
> > out (which might help rather than hiding them anyway)
> >
> > The attached copy doesn't have any hyperlinks. Hopefully that will solve
> > this problem.
>
> Looks good.
>
> >
> > 2. Landon can you review the first paragraph of the editorial and
> > double check year (2014 vs 2012), the sentence that says 4 is an
> > increase from 4, and decide if you really want to spell and
> > parenthesis numbers -- four (4)?
> >
> > This has been fixed.
>
> Looks mostly good.  If it were in svn, I would change "2" to "two" for
> consistency in the first paragraph.
>
> >
> > 3. The Australia/New Zealand Report says "We need this content" - get
> > content of delete.
> >
> > This has been fixed.
>
> It seems to still be there.  Maybe the pdf didn't get regenerated for
> this report.
>
> >
> > 4. The Francophone Chapter is missing a map.
> >
> > I had a map previously, but the chapter asked for its removal. This is a
> > language chapter rather than a country specific chapter. :]
>
> I see, now I know.
>
> >
> > 5. The Romanian Chapter has six things that should be urls that say,
> > "can be found here" and don't appear to have link information
> >
> > Couldn't find this problem, but I fixed some other layout errors.
>
> Check page 37 and 38. Try searching for "can be found here".
>
> >
> > 6. The Incubation Report seems to contain an entire section on the
> > ICA-OSGeo Lab Network.  I don't see that as in the realm of the
> > Incubation Committee and question whether the Incubation Committee
> > should be reporting on that (or if the Journal should be presenting
> > the ICA-OSGeo Lab Network as part of the Incubation Committee work).
> > I would welcome the ICA-OSGeo Lab Network having their own report and
> > section.
> >
> > Fixed. I think this was a copy/paste error on my part.
>
> This now appears to be the correct report.  Once the sources are in
> svn, I'll review and copy edit it.
>
> Thanks for the revisions.
>
> Eli
>
>
> >
> > Please review the attached and let me know if other changes are needed.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Landon
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > newsletter mailing list
> > newsletter at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/newsletter
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/newsletter/attachments/20151130/6cde9b18/attachment.html>