[OSGeo Oceania] Budget for FY 2021/2022

[Edoardo Neerhut]

Thanks for fantastic feedback.

*Conference*
I had similar thoughts on the conference to you John. From memory we agreed
to keep tabs on how conference plans develop over the next month or so and
incorporate that into conference expectations.

*Good Mojo*
Keen to hear from Alex here. I have been shamefully ignorant to the Good
Mojo fund of late.

*Microgrants*
I think it's reasonable to increase this given it will be the second
financial year of microgrants. This could be one we asterix and review
monthly before we finalise the budget and allocate a final figure. It'd be
great to see how current funds are used over the next couple of months.

*SIGs*
If new SIGs emerge, couldn't they be covered with the funds Outreach and
Community support? That's what happened this financial year, and then the
SIGs can get dedicated funding once they're established.

On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 22:14, Martin Tomko <tomkom at unimelb.edu.au> wrote:

> I agree here with John,
>
> I think we can be more optimistic than in the catastrophic plans we had
> mid last year, although I agree that being cautious is good.
>
> I would also like to see a further expansion of the local outreach and
> community support/SIGs and potentially supporting transaltion of local
> academic OS innovations to the OS ecosystem ,as we have canvased over a
> year ago with John ( but then COVID hit and we could not take off). I do
> not see space for this, including any potential support for SIGs (I
> understand they should be self-financing in the longer term, but there may
> be need for some start up funds for new ones) – working groups are, as we
> know, a different story ( Communication and Finance and Membership).
>
>
>
> Thank you all for the great job in planning ahead, great to see the
> community keeping momentum ( and apologies for radio silence for a while)!
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> *From: *Oceania <oceania-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of John
> Bryant <johnwbryant at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Friday, 26 March 2021 at 3:57 pm
> *To: *Oceania community <oceania at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [OSGeo Oceania] Budget for FY 2021/2022
>
> Thanks for the opportunity to contribute to budget planning. I have a few
> comments/questions.
>
>
>
> *1. Conference*
>
>
>
> The proposed budget includes an AUD $5000 loss for the conference, which
> doesn't align with past experience. Even last year, when plans were
> derailed mid-year and we had to create a new plan on the fly, we still
> turned a small profit overall [1], despite minimal focus on sponsorship.
>
>
>
> FOSS4G 2021 (global) will be fully online, and they're running a
> relatively successful sponsorship drive. If we are running another hybrid
> conference, it feels like there's potential to find sponsorship. Last
> year's event was the largest in-person event we've ever organised, in terms
> of overall attendance, and with that experience behind us, I think there's
> a significant value proposition for sponsors. Since conference revenue has
> been the predominant source of income for OO, I feel this is a sensible
> place to focus. The assumption there won't be any significant income feels
> like a self-fulfilling prophecy.
>
>
>
> *2. Good Mojo*
>
>
>
> A question about Good Mojo expenditure: why reduce it to zero? I guess
> there's still ~$8k in the Good Mojo fund since the 2020-2021 budget has 0
> under actual. I suggest this should be used, the people and orgs that
> contributed to it in 2018 and 2019 would probably like to see their
> contributions put to use. If there is an in-person event then maybe
> reviving the Travel Grant Program would make sense. Hubs could be enabled
> to have a local impact using these funds.
>
>
>
> *3. Microgrants*
>
>
>
> Last, re: Microgrants, I feel $2k won't be enough. There has been a lot of
> interest in the first few weeks of the program. $2k will only fund ~8
> grants over the whole year. I suspect we could increase this to $6k, which
> would average 2 grants per month.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> John
>
>
>
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/174P83K_AnDHrH-HbsJmAdXQfrdbTR9ElVcHtxQ1lrWw/edit#gid=1331367998
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 20:56, Greg Lauer <gregory.lauer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> The OSGeo Oceania Finance committee met earlier this week, and one of the
> items discussed is preparing a budget for FY 21/22. Once we have done this
> we will forward it to the OSGeo Oceania Board to approve. We plan to
> present to the Board at the April meeting in approx. 4 weeks.
>
>
>
> We would welcome input and discussion from OSGeo Oceania members and
> community around the budget. You can review 20/21 and the proposed 21/22
> budget at
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cbd3Rt5R688qrZ3eTCHxpRZ8HbII358_1UARf3m5qBs/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
>
> Too much? Too little? What should we be spending money on? Potential
> income sources?
>
>
>
> The key issue is that it is unlikely we will have any significant income
> for FY 21/22 as the Conference Working group is planning another hybrid
> virtual conference. We would hope this would not be the case in FY 22/23.
>
>
>
> We are looking forward to your input
>
>
>
> Many thanks,
>
>
>
> Greg, Alex, Dionne and Ed
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oceania mailing list
> Oceania at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/oceania
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oceania mailing list
> Oceania at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/oceania
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/oceania/attachments/20210326/faf3f556/attachment.html>