[OpenLayers-Dev] Automated Testing

Tim Schaub tschaub at openplans.org
Tue Dec 18 14:11:34 EST 2007


Christopher Schmidt wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 05:26:06PM -0700, Tim Schaub wrote:
>> I like the idea (and if we were making a policy I would suggest) that a 
>> patch creator does three things:
>> 1) make a ticket (more documentation than commit messages)
> I think that this is true, with the exception of things like:
> http://trac.openlayers.org/changeset/5439
> Which I don't really think need a ticket.   

Great, I agree.

>> 2) run at least the tests you know are relevant in at least one browser
>> 3) report what you did on the ticket
>> Are you suggesting less?
> Nope, but I think that we're still liable to break trunk that way, and
> I'd like to make it so that breaking trunk is found by a machine instead
> of by a human.

Sure, I think the automated tests are great.

The HowToContribute wiki page is a bit soft on describing commits to the 
trunk.  How about we agree on a procedure.  I think this fits what we're 
already doing (perhaps more lax in testing).  What do you (all) think of


Is that acceptable?

> Specifically, I expect that as we support a wider range of browsers with
> our tests (Opera is now as well supported as Firefox), we will find
> things that break other browsers that we don't think to test... and it
> lets us actually build a sane grid of what we support... and it lets us
> ensure that we don't have to run around like chickens with our heads cut
> off repairing Opera at release time.
> Right now, I think the requirement for 2) is ardurous because it's not
> 'in at least one browser' -- it's "in at least FF + IE before it hits
> trunk", and I think that's unrealistic long term as we add more
> developers to the project. 
> Regards,

More information about the Dev mailing list