[OpenLayers-Dev] Automated Testing
Paul Spencer
pspencer at dmsolutions.ca
Tue Dec 18 14:44:18 EST 2007
Tim,
I think that the non-functional modifications should exclude any
significant change to the test framework (run-tests, auto-tests) -
i.e. those would require a ticket and review, since we are relying on
the test framework to tell when stuff is broken. This would include
the changes I made yesterday, which in hindsight I should have
proposed and got some sort of review on. It would not include the
changes I made to the actual tests to accommodate Safari's CSS quirks
though.
I also think that the trivial modifications category could be a little
more lax unless the 'obvious typos' includes minor changes that are
not typos?
That being said, I don't feel strongly about changing it ... but I
don't think it captures the spirit of the change in process that Chris
was aiming for.
Paul
On 18-Dec-07, at 2:11 PM, Tim Schaub wrote:
> Sure, I think the automated tests are great.
>
> The HowToContribute wiki page is a bit soft on describing commits to
> the
> trunk. How about we agree on a procedure. I think this fits what
> we're
> already doing (perhaps more lax in testing). What do you (all)
> think of
>
> http://trac.openlayers.org/wiki/TrunkCommits
>
> Is that acceptable?
> Tim
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Paul Spencer pspencer at dmsolutions.ca |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Chief Technology Officer |
|DM Solutions Group Inc http://www.dmsolutions.ca/ |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the Dev
mailing list