[OpenLayers-Dev] PSC Vote on Sponsorship Doc

[Tim Schaub]

Thanks John.

Now, hearing from Chris and Cameron would be nice.

Tim

John R. Frank wrote:
> First, unless someone objects, I'll commit this patch to the document. 
> These two erroneous words ("three" and "available") should have been 
> deleted earlier.
> 
> Index: sponsoring
> ===================================================================
> --- sponsoring	(revision 8317)
> +++ sponsoring	(working copy)
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
>   Goals of Sponsorship
>   --------------------
> 
> -The OpenLayers community has established three high-level goals for
> +The OpenLayers community has established high-level goals for
>   the use of funds from sponsors.  The PSC votes periodically to
>   allocate funds according to these priorities.  The PSC also
>   periodically votes to revise these priorities.
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
>   3) Expand the number of people contributing functionality and
>      improvements to the OpenLayers code base.
> 
> -4) Make OpenLayers a more useful web mapping toolkit available by
> +4) Make OpenLayers a more useful web mapping toolkit by
>      enhancing the library.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Second, to Eric's point:
> 
>> Platinum sponsors may also have their logo placed directly on the 
>> OpenLayers home page.
> 
> 
> When we get platinum level sponsors, putting logos on the homepage seems 
> quite appropriate to me.  A sponsor at that level could reasonably ask for 
> lots of other recognition, and we'd probably hunt for ways to say thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> Third, I'm +1 on this document and would like to see hear some facts and 
> spirited debate about pros and cons of different banking options.  Then, 
> we can get to the real work of seeking sponsors.
> 
> 
> 
> John
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at openlayers.org
> http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev


-- 
Tim Schaub
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.