[OpenLayers-Dev] PSC Vote on Sponsorship Doc
John R. Frank
john.frank at metacarta.com
Wed Nov 12 03:31:49 EST 2008
First, unless someone objects, I'll commit this patch to the document.
These two erroneous words ("three" and "available") should have been
--- sponsoring (revision 8317)
+++ sponsoring (working copy)
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
Goals of Sponsorship
-The OpenLayers community has established three high-level goals for
+The OpenLayers community has established high-level goals for
the use of funds from sponsors. The PSC votes periodically to
allocate funds according to these priorities. The PSC also
periodically votes to revise these priorities.
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
3) Expand the number of people contributing functionality and
improvements to the OpenLayers code base.
-4) Make OpenLayers a more useful web mapping toolkit available by
+4) Make OpenLayers a more useful web mapping toolkit by
enhancing the library.
Second, to Eric's point:
> Platinum sponsors may also have their logo placed directly on the
> OpenLayers home page.
When we get platinum level sponsors, putting logos on the homepage seems
quite appropriate to me. A sponsor at that level could reasonably ask for
lots of other recognition, and we'd probably hunt for ways to say thanks.
Third, I'm +1 on this document and would like to see hear some facts and
spirited debate about pros and cons of different banking options. Then,
we can get to the real work of seeking sponsors.
More information about the Dev