[OpenLayers-Dev] DeleteFeature control
Alexandre Dube
adube at mapgears.com
Tue Jul 21 08:32:05 EDT 2009
Hi,
I'm trying to reproduce what we discuss. I'm not really familiar with
this method and I'm having difficulties with 'this'. Here's what I have
so far :
/*** START ***/
var delCtrl = new OpenLayers.Control({
layer: olWFSRoads,
handlers: {"keyboard": new OpenLayers.Handler.Keyboard(this,{ //
<------- 'this' is not the control
keydown: function(evt) {
var code = evt.keyCode;
//var features = this.layer.selectedFeatures; // <-------
this is not the control, and so on...
var features = olWFSRoads.selectedFeatures; // <----- can we
avoid the use of olWFSRoads ?
if(code == OpenLayers.Event.KEY_DELETE && features.length > 0 &&
this.confirmDelete() ) {
this.deleteFeatures(features);
return;
}
}
})},
controls: [
new OpenLayers.Control.SelectFeature(
olWFSRoads, {
onSelect: function(f) {
f.state = OpenLayers.State.DELETE;
this.layer.drawFeature(f);
}
})
],
confirmDelete: function() {
return (confirm("Delete selected features ?"))
},
deleteFeatures: function(features) {
this.layer.destroyFeatures(features);
}
});
/*** END ***/
I made the discussed changes to the OL.Control to be able to automatize
activation/deactivation/setMap.
If you look at the <---------- arrow, you'll see a 'this', which is
supposed to be the control, owner of the handler. Well, that 'this' is
not the control, it's the html page (figures). I tried to put 'delCtrl'
instead but it didn't work. I really wonder how I am supposed to create
controls that way (without creating a class) and use the 'this' (or
something else).
Any hint would be greatly appreciated,
Alexandre
P.S. Also, I believe it's ok to have my 'user' functions, like
confirmDelete directly inside the control since the control is
completely custom-made (i.e. not using events).
Alexandre Dube wrote:
> Eric Lemoine wrote:
>
>> so, to get to the delete control you've been working on, I see more
>> value, in terms of flexibility, in adding "control composition" to the
>> control base class.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> I also agree. Originally, the control had a Feature handler instead of
> a SelectFeature control. Looking at it now, it's too simple to be
> justified as a new control.
>
>
>>>> About the 'controls' property and the act./dea. automatism : that's a good idea, but wouldn't it be good to have a 'handlers' property also and activate/deactivate all handlers as well ? Currently, control has a 'handler' property only. Would it make sense to have 'handlers' added a do the same kind of automatism as the new 'controls' property ?
>>>>
>>>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Great.
>
>
>
--
Alexandre Dubé
Mapgears
www.mapgears.com
More information about the Dev
mailing list