[OpenLayers-Dev] 2.11 tickets

Tim Schaub tschaub at opengeo.org
Wed Apr 6 18:41:44 EDT 2011


On 4/6/11 10:28 AM, Eric Lemoine wrote:
>> Quick update:
>>
>> We now have 3 tickets in the Commit state, and 2 in the Review state. See [*].
>>
>> Two tickets are still waiting for CLAs: #3204/arneke, and
>> #3237/etdube, For the latter Etienne told me that he will send a CCLA
>> for Borealis). We have no new from arneke.
>>
>> Thanks a lot Tim for reviewing and committing Trond's WMC patch
>> (#3236), and for taking care of the "Google MaxExtent" issue (#3242),
>> this one was pretty scary.
>>
>> So I think we're in pretty good shape.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>> [*]<http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&group=state&order=priority&state=Review&state=Commit&col=id&col=summary&col=owner&col=type&col=priority&col=component&col=version&milestone=2.11+Release>
>
> Hi
>
>
> There's only one ticket left (#3237) in the 2.11 Commit + Review list
> (see above link). I'll commit the patch tomorrow.
>
> We just got a new ticket, #3249, which could be a regression. The
> ticket includes few information, so it is hard to tell.

http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3249

It is indeed a regression (introduced in with r11838).

I've posted a couple patches for review.

> I propose that, once #3237 is closed, we pull all tickets out of
> Milestone 2.11, and start the release procedure. Could the PSC vote on
> that? Everyone's invited to express opinions.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Cheers,
>


-- 
Tim Schaub
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.


More information about the Dev mailing list