[OpenLayers-Trac] Re: [OpenLayers] #3008: Build: Integrate Closure
Compiler on OpenLayers
OpenLayers
trac-20090302 at openlayers.org
Thu Feb 24 19:30:24 EST 2011
#3008: Build: Integrate Closure Compiler on OpenLayers
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jorix | Owner:
Type: feature | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: Future
Component: general | Version: 2.10
Keywords: | State:
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Changes (by crschmidt):
* state: Review =>
* milestone: 2.11 Release => Future
Comment:
jorix: Before looking at this patch (in response to another closure
compiler patch) I went ahead and added support for closure compiler to the
existing build tools. This functionality is much simpler than what you've
built, but it seems like you were really building something much more
complex than I think needs to be included in OpenLayers; essentially, you
were replicating the entire command line parsing of Closure in OpenLayers.
I think that it is reasonable to debug OpenLayers in closure by simply
building an uncompressed build (python build.py -c none) then running
closure on the resulting file with the options you want.
I expect if we make a shift to ADVANCED_OPTIMIZATIONS we may need to
enable more complex parsing and optimization, but for now I've simply
enabled the default closure options (SIMPLE), and things seem to work
okay.
I'm interested in what else this patch is trying to achieve. I see the
following:
* build/closure-compiler/OpenLayers/externs/errors-pending-to-fix-
undefined-variables.js looks pretty simple: just various bugfixes that I
should go review and fix. No problem.
* It looks like build/closure-compiler/OpenLayers/externs/Externs.js is
simply designed around preventing warnings, something I'm not super-
concerned about at the moment
* lib/OpenLayers/Events.js looks to be the same
* tools/mergejs.py Seems to be based around letting closure find the
files individually, instead of in one big chunk? is that right? And I
assume that comes in part from the desire to support the jsDoc stuff in
closure? Can you explain this part of the patch more?
* tools/NaturalDocs2JsDoc.py looks interesting for future work, but not
neccesary right now
* build/closure-compiler/closure-
compiler/contrib/externs/google_maps_api_v2.js I'm assuming is to prevent
more errors?
I assume that these externs and so on would be more neccesary if we were
going to approach full closure ADVANCED support, but with the simple
support, things seem to be working without, so I'm going to hold off on
moving forward on reviewing the work in this ticket until we're ready to
approach closure more thoroughly (or we find a bug in the current closure
behavior).
Thanks for the pointer!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/3008#comment:7>
OpenLayers <http://openlayers.org/>
A free AJAX map viewer
More information about the Trac
mailing list