[OpenLayers-Trac] Re: [OpenLayers] #3400: Feature modification
management
OpenLayers
trac-20090302 at openlayers.org
Mon Jul 4 04:08:18 EDT 2011
#3400: Feature modification management
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: ahocevar | Owner: tschaub
Type: feature | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: 2.12 Release
Component: Format.WFST | Version: 2.10
Keywords: | State: Review
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment(by ahocevar):
Thanks for the review Bart.
Replying to [comment:3 bartvde]:
> * modified, shouldn't we call this originals or originalValues instead?
To me the modified term sounds misleading, since I would expect it to have
the modified values instead and not the originals?
Most applications will look in the modified object and just see if it is
truthy for a field ({{{if (modified.geometry) {/*do something*/}}}})
Having to write ({{{if (originalValues.geometry) {/*do something*/}}}}
looks a bit awkward to me. ExtJS also uses the name "modified" for an
object on records, with the same content.
> * with tests/Format/WFST/v1.html I would expect only the geometry to be
written out, since it is the only one in modified? Why are the 2
attributes written out as well? I see it in the code (the check for
feature.attributes), but it's not what I would expect to happen. Or is
this to be backwards-compatible? I guess so, but maybe state it somewhere
in a comment?
Exactly, this is for backwards compatibility. I made this more clear in
the APIdoc comments of the new patch. Think of somebody upgrading
OpenLayers and using the ModifyFeature control, then updating a WFS
through the WFS protocol. No attribute would ever be written if the user
didn't care about updating modified.attributes.
> * tests/Control/ModifyFeature.html: layer.addFeatures[feature] is
missing brackets
Good catch, thanks. Fixed in new patch.
> * lib/OpenLayers/Format/WFST/v1.js: should we not also check if the
original and modified values differ?
If a geometry or attribute ends up in modified, it was usually modified.
If the user changes it back to the original, and you only update them when
they differ, you may end up with empty Update operations in WFS-T. I think
it would overcomplicate things to take care of this.
Please see [attachment:openlayers-3400.2.patch] for the new patch, and let
me know if there are more concerns.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/3400#comment:4>
OpenLayers <http://openlayers.org/>
A free AJAX map viewer
More information about the Trac
mailing list