[OpenLayers-Users] difference between OpenLayers.Layer.WMS and
OpenLayers.Layer.MapServer?
Paul Spencer
pagameba at gmail.com
Wed Mar 18 07:26:21 EDT 2009
I disagree that WMS is more performant, secure and robust than the
mapserv CGI. In fact, WMS is less performant due to some outstanding
performance issues with the PROJ library and EPSG code lookups (see http://blog.cleverelephant.ca/2009/03/sprint-day-3.html
for some details on upcoming changes that might eliminate this
particular problem).
Can you explain why you think there is more inherent security and
robustness in WMS vs CGI?
Paul
On 13-Mar-09, at 3:25 AM, Guillaume Sueur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The first one uses WMS and the second one is directly hitting the
> mapfile. For performance, security, robustness and so I would
> suggest to
> use WMS, but if you don't care about all these (and you can) just use
> .MapServer and use it like your old cgi buddy !
>
> Regards
>
> Guillaume
>
> MeLv1n wAuRaN a écrit :
>> hi all,
>>
>> what's the difference between OpenLayers.Layer.WMS and
>> OpenLayers.Layer.MapServer? i'm using a mapserver cgi to render my
>> mapfile. so, which one should i use? the wms or the mapserver?
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at openlayers.org
>> http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at openlayers.org
> http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/users
More information about the Users
mailing list