[Live-demo] i3geo on OSGeo-Live 6.5?

[Edmar Moretti]

Cameron,

In fact, the i3Geo is not fully translated into English and Spanish. A 
small part of the interface is translated, but the user manuals and 
administrator are not.
I do not know if in 6 months be able to translate everything, but we 
will work for it.
On the issue of code quality, there are always favorable and unfavorable 
opinions. I also do not know the blog has been mentioned, but there is 
an ongoing effort to improve the code, and the opinions of experts are 
always welcome.
In relation to not include in the next version, I'm sad, but the only 
thing I can do is keep working on software evolution. We engage in a lot 
of preparation for i3Geo live-dvd and I was surprised with the decision, 
but that's life ...


De fato, o i3Geo não está totalmente traduzido para o Inglês e Espanhol. 
Uma pequena parte da interface está traduzida, mas os manuais de usuário 
e administrador não estão.
Não sei se em 6 meses conseguiremos traduzir tudo, mas trabalharemos 
para isso.
Sobre a questão da qualidade do código, sempre existem opiniões 
favoráveis e  desfavoráveis. Eu também não conheço o blog que foi 
mencionado, mas há um esforço contínuo de aprimoramento do código, e as 
opiniões dos especialistas são sempre bem vindas.
Em relação a não incluir na próxima versão, eu fico triste, mas a única 
coisa que eu posso fazer é continuar trabalhando na evolução do 
software. Nos dedicamos muito na preparação do i3Geo para o live-dvd e 
fiquei surpreso com a decisão, mas é a vida...



Em 11-01-2013 04:55, Cameron Shorter escreveu:
> Edmar, Valenty, Javier,
>
> At our weekly OSGeo-Live IRC meeting [1], we discussed which new 
> applications to include on OSGeoLive.
> In discussing i3geo, we had concerns that about i3geo's readiness for 
> our 6.5 release timeframe, and suspect that it would be better for 
> i3geo to target the osgeolive 7.0 release (6 months later).
>
> In particular, it seems that i3geo's English interface is not as good 
> as the Spanish interface yet.
> dbb also mentioned a blog post discussing the quality of the i3geo 
> code. (I haven't seen the mentioned blog)
>
> What this would probably mean would be that we'd include the i3geo 
> installer (so developers can test the application) but not actually 
> install the application.
>
> Comments?
>
>
> [1] http://irclogs.geoapt.com/osgeolive/%23osgeolive.2013-01-10.log
>

-- 

http://edmarmoretti.com.br
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/osgeolive/attachments/20130111/89fa6ff3/attachment.html>