[Live-demo] pywps to osgeo-live

[Angelos Tzotsos]

Hi Jachym,

Please commit you script in svn under bin folder.
When time comes I will link it in the main build script.

Thanks,
Angelos

On 08/04/2014 04:21 PM, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
> I have nothing against pushing it to next release, I understand, that
> we are feature freeze phase right now
>
> btw, shell I append the install script to svn/trunk already? any issue
> with that? I can fix the script in svn afterwards ?
>
> Jachym
>
> 2014-08-04 15:04 GMT+02:00 Edwards, Ian <ian.edwards at metoffice.gov.uk>:
>> Hi Jachym,
>>
>> There's a typo in your build script on line 67 [1]
>>
>>    wget -c "https://github.com/geopython/PyWPS/aaggrchive/pywps-3.2.2.tar.gz"
>>                                                 ^^^^
>>
>> If PyWPS is not essential for one of the FOSS4G workshop then it would make sense to wait for OSGeo Live 8.5 for better testing.
>>
>> Ian
>>
>>
>> [1] https://gist.github.com/jachym/0701ffcb8c7035476dd7
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: live-demo-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:live-demo-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Angelos Tzotsos
>> Sent: 04 August 2014 13:47
>> To: live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
>> Subject: Re: [Live-demo] pywps to osgeo-live
>>
>> On 08/04/2014 01:50 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
>>> I agree with Ian.
>>>
>>> To avoid confusion I think we should perhaps update our overview and
>>> split up web services [1]. Now it reads: "publishing spatial data to
>>> the internet". That does not cover all services, nor is the list very
>>> understandable.
>>>
>>> I suggest split it up in data publishing services, metadata publishing
>>> services, processing services and other services. With a short
>>> explanation of what they mean with a reference to the pages describing
>>> the standards that we already have [2].
>>>
>>> I believe these standards pages also need some more care. I really
>>> wonder if anyone who is not familiar can read those.
>>>
>>> The user with little domain-specific knowledge should probably first
>>> find out that what he really needs is a WPS service, and then have a
>>> look at the different possibilities. In fact one could argue that we
>>> could have a quickstart about consuming the services could be separate
>>> from the quickstart for configuring services...
>>>
>>> [1] http://live.osgeo.org/en/overview/overview.html
>>> [2] http://live.osgeo.org/en/standards/standards.html
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Live-demo mailing list
>>> Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
>>> http://live.osgeo.org
>>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
>>> .
>>>
>> I agree that PyWPS should be included in OSGeoLive in 8.5.
>>
>> Having a better application to demonstrate its capabilities, or a quickstart using QGIS WPS plugin would be a nice thing to have.
>> Same applies for Iris, a nice demonstration is what new users will see first ;)
>>
>> Best,
>> Angelos
>>
>> --
>> Angelos Tzotsos
>> Remote Sensing Laboratory
>> National Technical University of Athens
>> http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Live-demo mailing list
>> Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
>> http://live.osgeo.org
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
>> _______________________________________________
>> Live-demo mailing list
>> Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
>> http://live.osgeo.org
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
>
>


-- 
Angelos Tzotsos
Remote Sensing Laboratory
National Technical University of Athens
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos