[Live-demo] pywps to osgeo-live

Jachym Cepicky jachym.cepicky at gmail.com
Mon Aug 4 06:21:58 PDT 2014


I have nothing against pushing it to next release, I understand, that
we are feature freeze phase right now

btw, shell I append the install script to svn/trunk already? any issue
with that? I can fix the script in svn afterwards ?

Jachym

2014-08-04 15:04 GMT+02:00 Edwards, Ian <ian.edwards at metoffice.gov.uk>:
> Hi Jachym,
>
> There's a typo in your build script on line 67 [1]
>
>   wget -c "https://github.com/geopython/PyWPS/aaggrchive/pywps-3.2.2.tar.gz"
>                                                ^^^^
>
> If PyWPS is not essential for one of the FOSS4G workshop then it would make sense to wait for OSGeo Live 8.5 for better testing.
>
> Ian
>
>
> [1] https://gist.github.com/jachym/0701ffcb8c7035476dd7
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: live-demo-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:live-demo-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Angelos Tzotsos
> Sent: 04 August 2014 13:47
> To: live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [Live-demo] pywps to osgeo-live
>
> On 08/04/2014 01:50 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
>> I agree with Ian.
>>
>> To avoid confusion I think we should perhaps update our overview and
>> split up web services [1]. Now it reads: "publishing spatial data to
>> the internet". That does not cover all services, nor is the list very
>> understandable.
>>
>> I suggest split it up in data publishing services, metadata publishing
>> services, processing services and other services. With a short
>> explanation of what they mean with a reference to the pages describing
>> the standards that we already have [2].
>>
>> I believe these standards pages also need some more care. I really
>> wonder if anyone who is not familiar can read those.
>>
>> The user with little domain-specific knowledge should probably first
>> find out that what he really needs is a WPS service, and then have a
>> look at the different possibilities. In fact one could argue that we
>> could have a quickstart about consuming the services could be separate
>> from the quickstart for configuring services...
>>
>> [1] http://live.osgeo.org/en/overview/overview.html
>> [2] http://live.osgeo.org/en/standards/standards.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> Live-demo mailing list
>> Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
>> http://live.osgeo.org
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
>> .
>>
> I agree that PyWPS should be included in OSGeoLive in 8.5.
>
> Having a better application to demonstrate its capabilities, or a quickstart using QGIS WPS plugin would be a nice thing to have.
> Same applies for Iris, a nice demonstration is what new users will see first ;)
>
> Best,
> Angelos
>
> --
> Angelos Tzotsos
> Remote Sensing Laboratory
> National Technical University of Athens
> http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
>
> _______________________________________________
> Live-demo mailing list
> Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
> http://live.osgeo.org
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
> _______________________________________________
> Live-demo mailing list
> Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
> http://live.osgeo.org
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc



-- 
Jachym Cepicky
e-mail: jachym.cepicky gmail com
URL: http://les-ejk.cz
GPG: http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp

Give your code freedom with PyWPS - http://pywps.wald.intevation.org



More information about the Osgeolive mailing list