[Live-demo] OSGeoLive 9.0 status: alpha1

[Patric Hafner | geOps]

Hi Angelos,

our installer for Cartaro is (currently?) independent of the 
architecture. Should I include an option to set the build architecture 
as argument anyway?

Best regards,
Patric


On 06/25/2015 11:02 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In order to start working on 64 bit installers, we need a way to provide
> the build architecture to the installer scripts as arguments.
>
> This pull request shows a working example of such a solution:
> https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/pull/9
> https://github.com/kalxas/OSGeoLive/commit/db5dd9897fdec3373c82f116cbe503e07abe70ab
>
>
> So I would like to call the projects listed bellow to update their
> installers accordingly.
>
> Thanks,
> Angelos
>
>
> On 06/16/2015 07:25 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
>>
>> Initial testing results show that 32 bit iso is in great shape, only 1
>> project has major issues (Ushahidi).
>>
>> For 64 bit iso things are a bit different. Projects need to provide
>> patches for installers to use 64bit code.
>> Projects failing in 64 bit iso:
>> 1. Cartaro
>> 2. Kosmo
>> 3. gpsdrive
>> 4. gvsig
>> 5. mb-system
>> 6. OpenCPN
>> 7. ossim
>> 8. uDig
>> 9. Ushahidi
>>
>> Best,
>> Angelos
>>
>
>