[Live-demo] OSGeoLive 9.0 status: alpha1

[Angelos Tzotsos]

Hi Patric,

No need to include this option if you do not have any parts that are 
architecture specific.

Best regards,
Angelos

On 07/08/2015 08:00 PM, Patric Hafner | geOps wrote:
> Hi Angelos,
>
> our installer for Cartaro is (currently?) independent of the 
> architecture. Should I include an option to set the build architecture 
> as argument anyway?
>
> Best regards,
> Patric
>
>
> On 06/25/2015 11:02 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In order to start working on 64 bit installers, we need a way to provide
>> the build architecture to the installer scripts as arguments.
>>
>> This pull request shows a working example of such a solution:
>> https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/pull/9
>> https://github.com/kalxas/OSGeoLive/commit/db5dd9897fdec3373c82f116cbe503e07abe70ab 
>>
>>
>>
>> So I would like to call the projects listed bellow to update their
>> installers accordingly.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Angelos
>>
>>
>> On 06/16/2015 07:25 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
>>>
>>> Initial testing results show that 32 bit iso is in great shape, only 1
>>> project has major issues (Ushahidi).
>>>
>>> For 64 bit iso things are a bit different. Projects need to provide
>>> patches for installers to use 64bit code.
>>> Projects failing in 64 bit iso:
>>> 1. Cartaro
>>> 2. Kosmo
>>> 3. gpsdrive
>>> 4. gvsig
>>> 5. mb-system
>>> 6. OpenCPN
>>> 7. ossim
>>> 8. uDig
>>> 9. Ushahidi
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Angelos
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
OSGeo Charter Member
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos