[Live-demo] Motion: merge GSoC-2015 PR

[Cameron Shorter]

-1 from me for including all python notebooks on the upcoming OSGeo-Live 
9.5 release in a few days. I don't think we can make it ready in time.

This is based on my preliminary review of the gsoc iso:
http://osprey.ucdavis.edu/downloads/osgeo/gisvm/gisvm/9.5nightly/osgeo-live-nightly-gsoc-amd64-c83a060.iso

I haven't done a comprehensive review, but have reviewed enough to feel 
the initial user experience when looking at notebooks is close, but is 
yet to meet our OSGeo-Live presentation standards.

My comments so far:

1. Quickstart review comments haven't been addressed yet, although 
hopefully Massimo should have that complete soon.

2. Structure of notebook docs directory should be by project, rather 
than singled out as a GSoC directory, then by project. Long term we want 
GSoC content to be part of the core OSGeo-Live offering.

3. We are missing an obvious Table of Contents.

4. I've randomly picked iris_basics.ipynb, running step 2, I get a 
warning about a library being deprecated. (It still works, but this is 
the sort of thing that should be cleaned up before presenting to a new 
user).

5. There should be an introductory notebook which starts with "Press the 
RUN CELL button to see the output of [In] cells".

6.1 I've found a number of spelling and grammar errors in the first GSoC 
notebook I reviewed. Nothing major, but they should be identified and 
cleaned up all the same.
For example, this is the first paragraph of the GDAL/OGR Quickstart 
(which is the first Docbook I looked at):

/"The first Notebook is dedicared [SPELLING] to the use of the 
Geospatial Data Abstraction Library GDAL [USE BRACES AROUND FIRST USE OF 
CAPITALS] from the bash command line. GDAL is a powerful translator 
library for raster and vector geospatial data formats [INSERT FULL STOP] 
it presents a single raster abstract data model and vector abstract data 
model to the calling application for all supported formats."/

6.2 In the same notebook, I found:
/"#unfinished - need to add ogr2ogr features yet, I'm considering to 
split this notebook in 2 parts (one for gdal and one for ogr2ogr) i'll 
study the gdal tutorial released recently"/

Massimo notes that he is fixing this, but my point is that I'm assuming 
that if reviewed, similar issues would be found in other notebooks.

7. The term "IPython" and "Jupyter" is used interchangeably, which would 
be confusing for a new user, and I'd be interested to understand if is 
technically incorrect?

8. Quantity of material to review and short time period. We have days 
left before the our final release candidate is due, and multiple 
notebooks (say 20+ ?) which I suggest need review to get to same level 
of review as Project Overviews and Quickstarts.

9. Also on quantity of material, we are introducing a maintenance load 
for future OSGeo-Live releases, and we are as yet to build up a 
community of volunteers willing to maintain these notebooks. Massimo and 
Brian have been doing a great job creating these notebooks, but are 
already under time pressure to update for this release, let alone future 
releases. I think we need to reach out to all projects with the offer of:
"A notebook has been created for your project. If you are prepared to 
review it now, and commit to verifying it is still valid before each 
OSGeo-Live release, then we will include the notebook on OSGeo-Live."

--
So my recommendation is to either:
A. Include Notebooks on next OSGeo-Live 9.5, but remove reference to it 
from main docs. (My preference at this point)

B. Include ONE Jupyter notebook example which can be found from main 
docs, which we make sure is well reviewed. All the remainder of 
Notebooks to be hidden. (This will likely be a messy solution, as we'd 
probably need to move directories around so they are hard to find for a 
new user).

On 9/03/2016 11:44 pm, massimo di stefano wrote:
> To All,
>
> during the last 2 years I worked in having the python software 
> ecosystem included in the OSGeo-Live.
> The PR proposed below [1] is a first step towards the official 
> inclusion of this work into the project.
>
> As you may have noticed from previous e-email [2] there isn’t a clear 
> agreement on the decision to take.
> We had an IRC discussion (logs [3]) with an initial motion to merge 
> the notebook PR.
>
> I would like to have a voting started here on the mailing.
> this is mine:
>
>  +1
>
>
> Thanks,
> Massimo.
>
>
> ===
>
> [1] https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-Notebooks/pull/5
> [2] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/live-demo/2016-March/011010.html
> [3] http://irclogs.geoapt.com/osgeolive/%23osgeolive.2016-03-07.log 
> <http://irclogs.geoapt.com/osgeolive/#osgeolive.2016-03-07.log>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Live-demo mailing list
> Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
> http://live.osgeo.org
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc

-- 
Cameron Shorter,
Software and Data Solutions Manager
LISAsoft
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009

P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com,  F +61 2 9009 5099

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/osgeolive/attachments/20160310/dfae057e/attachment.html>