[Live-demo] Translations and Proj4 documentation

Sun Jun 11 15:11:44 PDT 2017

Hi Julien,

proj4 will not be removed from OSGeo-Live, since it is a dependency of 
many other projects, but it will not be included in the documentation 
pages, unless we get an update. The deadline for the final documentation 
is July 3rd (not the same as for beta1, which is June 21st), so there is 
some more time.
The pages you propose to use look good to me.
You do not need to worry about the translations yet, there is another 
deadline for those (few days before the release, ~July 20).

Regards,
Angelos

On 06/11/2017 11:58 PM, Julien Moquet wrote:
> Hi Vicky,
>
> Do you mean we got 5 days to make the changes requested otherwise proj4
> will be out of OSGEO live ?
>
> The version are not the good ones on the overview. I think it is the only
> change that can be done on the 11 languages !
> May be we shall kick out MetaCRS later ?
>
>
> Also, as I read mapserver quickstart, I think we can make a quickstart out
> of :
> https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.4/blob/master/docs/source/apps/proj.rst
> https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.4/blob/master/docs/source/apps/geod.rst
> https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.4/blob/master/docs/source/apps/cs2cs.rst
> with a final link to http://proj4.org/index.html.
>
>
> @Kbevers
> Hi Kristian,
> What do you think of it ?
> It's easy to provide and maintain.
>
>
> Regards,
> Julien.
>
>
> 2017-06-11 18:11 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de>:
>
>> Hi Julien, et all
>> Maybe you can help me.
>> It so happened that I sent another mail asking about what version to use,
>> while reviewing today, I saw that I didn't send the mail to proj4.
>> (my mail merge skills are not so good)
>>
>> So, here is the hand made mail:
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With the upcoming OSGeo-Live 11.0 reboot, we will be re-inserting each
>> project into the OSGeo-Live baseline once someone from each project has
>> replied to confirm that they have reviewed docs and verified the
>> application works as expected.
>>
>> Can you please:
>>   0. Reply by return email to confirm that you have recieved this email and
>> that you are able to check docs within the next 2 weeks. (sooner would be
>> better if you can)
>>   1. Reply to confirm the Project Overview is still accurate, or has been
>> updated, (and version numbers are correct)
>>   2. Reply to confirm you have run a recent OSGeo-Live version (the
>> previous 10.5 version is ok), and updated the quickstart where needed.
>>   We understand that version 4.9.2 of proj4 will be installed on OSGeo-Live
>> 11.0 (Version 4.9.2 was installed on OSGeo-Live 10.5.)
>> (all in one reply is ok)
>>
>> Full package status can be seen here:
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5BaEgQtgw4O1bXyeWMl
>> M8XtAOhUgcjZ7Y2O0FZc2H0/edit?hl=en_GB#gid=2014800150
>>
>> Key Milestones
>> -------------------
>> 18-Jun-2017    All docs reviewed and verified
>> 21-Jun-2017    OSGeo-Live delivered to UAT (final application versions
>> installed - Beta stage)
>> 24-Jul-2017    OSGeo-Live Final ISO
>> 14-Aug-2017 FOSS4G 2017 Boston
>>
>> ... full schedule http://spreadsheets.google.com
>> /ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdE1SYUN3YWJ2N1NpSUczbW9IRWZNclE&hl=en_GB
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>> Hi Julien,
>>>
>>> Thanks for offering to help with translations. I'm looping in Niko and
>>> Vicky who are currently wrestling with trying to get transifex to work. If
>>> you are familiar with it, you might be able to help them.
>>>
>>> Warm regards, Cameron
>>>
>>> On 2/6/17 3:22 am, Julien Moquet wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>>> It would be ok to say "Proj4 has been translated into other languages,
>>> including proj4js, ..."
>>>> Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ..
>>> I am fully agree too.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And as OsGeoLive aims to be multilanguages, I can help on the proj4
>>> French Translation pages.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-05-31 22:15 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>:
>>>
>>>> On jeudi 1 juin 2017 05:57:38 CEST Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Evan,
>>>>> Yes, MetaCRS was a project gathering all the Proj4 projects together.
>>>>> However, it appears that proj4 is the only project in that grouping
>>>>> which is active?
>>>>> Hence my thoughts are that "MetaCRS" should be dropped from OSGeo-Live
>>>>> as a concept and "Proj4" be used instead. It would be ok to say "Proj4
>>>>> has been translated into other languages, including proj4js, ..."
>>>>> Your thoughts are welcome.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regarding what is listed currently in metacrs :
>>>>
>>>> - proj4js: no opinion
>>>>
>>>> - cs-map: no-opinion
>>>>
>>>> - geotiff/libgeotiff: heavily used underneath by GDAL in particular,
>>>> mostly in maintaince mode, but can be treated as a technical dependency
>>>> that doesn't require to be visible from users.
>>>>
>>>> - proj4j: no opinion
>>>>
>>>> - spatialreference.org: not maintained in years. http://epsg.io/ would
>>>> be a possible replacement
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ... meta for folks exploring
>>>> OSGeo-Live content, so it could make sense exposing proj.4 as a standalone
>>>> project.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
>>>>
>>>> http://www.spatialys.com
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cameron Shorter
>>> M +61 419 142 254 <+61%20419%20142%20254>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
>> Salzmannstraße 44,
>> 81739 München, Germany
>>
>> Vicky Vergara
>> Operations Research
>>
>> eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
>> Web: https://georepublic.info
>>
>> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
>> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
>>
>> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
>> CEO: Daniel Kastl
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Live-demo mailing list
> Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
> http://live.osgeo.org
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc

-- 
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
Charter Member
Open Source Geospatial Foundation
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/osgeolive/attachments/20170612/62b147b8/attachment.html>