[Live-demo] Translations and Proj4 documentation

Tue Jun 13 13:05:00 PDT 2017

Here we go !

I'll try to send a pull request tonight.

Regards,
Julien.

2017-06-12 9:58 GMT+02:00 Kristian Evers <kreve at sdfe.dk>:

> Julien,
>
>
>
> Sure, go ahead. Please don’t expect me to do anything regarding this – I
> am focusing my effort elsewhere.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Kristian
>
>
>
> *Fra:* Julien Moquet [mailto:moquet.julien at gmail.com]
> *Sendt:* 11. juni 2017 22:59
> *Til:* Vicky Vergara; Kristian Evers
> *Cc:* Cameron Shorter; Even Rouault; OSGeo-Live; Baka Niko
> *Emne:* Re: Translations and Proj4 documentation
>
>
>
> Hi Vicky,
>
> Do you mean we got 5 days to make the changes requested otherwise proj4
> will be out of OSGEO live ?
>
> The version are not the good ones on the overview. I think it is the only
> change that can be done on the 11 languages !
>
> May be we shall kick out MetaCRS later ?
>
> Also, as I read mapserver quickstart, I think we can make a quickstart out
> of :
> https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.4/blob/master/docs/source/apps/proj.rst
> https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.4/blob/master/docs/source/apps/geod.rst
> https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.4/blob/master/docs/source/apps/cs2cs.rst
>
> with a final link to http://proj4.org/index.html.
>
> @Kbevers
> Hi Kristian,
> What do you think of it ?
>
> It's easy to provide and maintain.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Julien.
>
>
>
> 2017-06-11 18:11 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de>:
>
> Hi Julien, et all
>
> Maybe you can help me.
>
> It so happened that I sent another mail asking about what version to use,
> while reviewing today, I saw that I didn't send the mail to proj4.
>
> (my mail merge skills are not so good)
>
>
> So, here is the hand made mail:
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> With the upcoming OSGeo-Live 11.0 reboot, we will be re-inserting each
> project into the OSGeo-Live baseline once someone from each project has
> replied to confirm that they have reviewed docs and verified the
> application works as expected.
>
> Can you please:
>  0. Reply by return email to confirm that you have recieved this email and
> that you are able to check docs within the next 2 weeks. (sooner would be
> better if you can)
>  1. Reply to confirm the Project Overview is still accurate, or has been
> updated, (and version numbers are correct)
>  2. Reply to confirm you have run a recent OSGeo-Live version (the
> previous 10.5 version is ok), and updated the quickstart where needed.
>  We understand that version 4.9.2 of proj4 will be installed on OSGeo-Live
> 11.0 (Version 4.9.2 was installed on OSGeo-Live 10.5.)
>
> (all in one reply is ok)
>
>
> Full package status can be seen here:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5BaEgQtgw4O1bXyeWMlM8XtAOhUg
> cjZ7Y2O0FZc2H0/edit?hl=en_GB#gid=2014800150
>
> Key Milestones
> -------------------
> 18-Jun-2017    All docs reviewed and verified
> 21-Jun-2017    OSGeo-Live delivered to UAT (final application versions
> installed - Beta stage)
> 24-Jul-2017    OSGeo-Live Final ISO
> 14-Aug-2017 FOSS4G 2017 Boston
>
> ... full schedule http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_
> RdE1SYUN3YWJ2N1NpSUczbW9IRWZNclE&hl=en_GB
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Julien,
>
> Thanks for offering to help with translations. I'm looping in Niko and
> Vicky who are currently wrestling with trying to get transifex to work. If
> you are familiar with it, you might be able to help them.
>
> Warm regards, Cameron
>
>
>
> On 2/6/17 3:22 am, Julien Moquet wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> It would be ok to say "Proj4 has been translated into other languages,
> including proj4js, ..."
> > Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ..
>
> I am fully agree too.
>
>
>
> And as OsGeoLive aims to be multilanguages, I can help on the proj4 French
> Translation pages.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
> 2017-05-31 22:15 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>:
>
> On jeudi 1 juin 2017 05:57:38 CEST Cameron Shorter wrote:
>
> > Hi Evan,
>
> >
>
> > Yes, MetaCRS was a project gathering all the Proj4 projects together.
>
> > However, it appears that proj4 is the only project in that grouping
>
> > which is active?
>
> >
>
> > Hence my thoughts are that "MetaCRS" should be dropped from OSGeo-Live
>
> > as a concept and "Proj4" be used instead. It would be ok to say "Proj4
>
> > has been translated into other languages, including proj4js, ..."
>
> >
>
> > Your thoughts are welcome.
>
>
>
> Regarding what is listed currently in metacrs :
>
> - proj4js: no opinion
>
> - cs-map: no-opinion
>
> - geotiff/libgeotiff: heavily used underneath by GDAL in particular,
> mostly in maintaince mode, but can be treated as a technical dependency
> that doesn't require to be visible from users.
>
> - proj4j: no opinion
>
> - spatialreference.org: not maintained in years. http://epsg.io/ would be
> a possible replacement
>
>
>
> Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ... meta for folks exploring
> OSGeo-Live content, so it could make sense exposing proj.4 as a standalone
> project.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
>
> http://www.spatialys.com
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Cameron Shorter
>
> M +61 419 142 254 <+61%20419%20142%20254>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
>
> Salzmannstraße 44,
>
> 81739 München, Germany
>
>
>
> Vicky Vergara
>
> Operations Research
>
>
>
> eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
>
> Web: https://georepublic.info
>
>
>
> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
>
> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
>
>
>
> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
>
> CEO: Daniel Kastl
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/osgeolive/attachments/20170613/9aafdc9f/attachment.html>