[Live-demo] Translations and Proj4 documentation

[Julien Moquet]

Hi Vicky,

My fork is up to date regarding the overview and quickstart:
https://github.com/julien2512/OSGeoLive-doc

Before making a pull request, I need to test it over the OsGeoLive-10.5 (on
wednesday or thursday).

Although, as I read the sources.list include in this version, I don't
really think the latest proj4 will be used.
The ubuntugis is used for that, and there is only the stable 4.8.0-3 proj4
release to be used.
See :
http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable/ubuntu/pool/main/p/proj/
and
https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/blob/osgeolive_10_5/sources.list.d/ubuntugis.list

That's why I finally don't have to change the proj4 release on its overview.
I only bypass the metacrs and stuff.

Regards,
Julien.


2017-06-11 18:11 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de>:

> Hi Julien, et all
> Maybe you can help me.
> It so happened that I sent another mail asking about what version to use,
> while reviewing today, I saw that I didn't send the mail to proj4.
> (my mail merge skills are not so good)
>
> So, here is the hand made mail:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> With the upcoming OSGeo-Live 11.0 reboot, we will be re-inserting each
> project into the OSGeo-Live baseline once someone from each project has
> replied to confirm that they have reviewed docs and verified the
> application works as expected.
>
> Can you please:
>  0. Reply by return email to confirm that you have recieved this email and
> that you are able to check docs within the next 2 weeks. (sooner would be
> better if you can)
>  1. Reply to confirm the Project Overview is still accurate, or has been
> updated, (and version numbers are correct)
>  2. Reply to confirm you have run a recent OSGeo-Live version (the
> previous 10.5 version is ok), and updated the quickstart where needed.
>  We understand that version 4.9.2 of proj4 will be installed on OSGeo-Live
> 11.0 (Version 4.9.2 was installed on OSGeo-Live 10.5.)
> (all in one reply is ok)
>
> Full package status can be seen here:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5BaEgQtgw4O1bXyeWMl
> M8XtAOhUgcjZ7Y2O0FZc2H0/edit?hl=en_GB#gid=2014800150
>
> Key Milestones
> -------------------
> 18-Jun-2017    All docs reviewed and verified
> 21-Jun-2017    OSGeo-Live delivered to UAT (final application versions
> installed - Beta stage)
> 24-Jul-2017    OSGeo-Live Final ISO
> 14-Aug-2017 FOSS4G 2017 Boston
>
> ... full schedule http://spreadsheets.google.com
> /ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdE1SYUN3YWJ2N1NpSUczbW9IRWZNclE&hl=en_GB
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Julien,
>>
>> Thanks for offering to help with translations. I'm looping in Niko and
>> Vicky who are currently wrestling with trying to get transifex to work. If
>> you are familiar with it, you might be able to help them.
>>
>> Warm regards, Cameron
>>
>> On 2/6/17 3:22 am, Julien Moquet wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> >> It would be ok to say "Proj4 has been translated into other languages,
>> including proj4js, ..."
>> > Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ..
>>
>> I am fully agree too.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> And as OsGeoLive aims to be multilanguages, I can help on the proj4
>> French Translation pages.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> 2017-05-31 22:15 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>:
>>
>>> On jeudi 1 juin 2017 05:57:38 CEST Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Evan,
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > Yes, MetaCRS was a project gathering all the Proj4 projects together.
>>>
>>> > However, it appears that proj4 is the only project in that grouping
>>>
>>> > which is active?
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > Hence my thoughts are that "MetaCRS" should be dropped from OSGeo-Live
>>>
>>> > as a concept and "Proj4" be used instead. It would be ok to say "Proj4
>>>
>>> > has been translated into other languages, including proj4js, ..."
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > Your thoughts are welcome.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regarding what is listed currently in metacrs :
>>>
>>> - proj4js: no opinion
>>>
>>> - cs-map: no-opinion
>>>
>>> - geotiff/libgeotiff: heavily used underneath by GDAL in particular,
>>> mostly in maintaince mode, but can be treated as a technical dependency
>>> that doesn't require to be visible from users.
>>>
>>> - proj4j: no opinion
>>>
>>> - spatialreference.org: not maintained in years. http://epsg.io/ would
>>> be a possible replacement
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ... meta for folks exploring
>>> OSGeo-Live content, so it could make sense exposing proj.4 as a standalone
>>> project.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
>>>
>>> http://www.spatialys.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cameron Shorter
>> M +61 419 142 254 <+61%20419%20142%20254>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
> Salzmannstraße 44,
> 81739 München, Germany
>
> Vicky Vergara
> Operations Research
>
> eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
> Web: https://georepublic.info
>
> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
>
> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
> CEO: Daniel Kastl
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/osgeolive/attachments/20170614/ccea499d/attachment.html>